(23) In Baraga county, in the state of Michigan, USA, in January 2021, the police, the mayor and elected county officals have refused to continue implementing lockdowns as they have gone on too long since March 2020, and they feel that Constitutional rights and Human rights are being breached and that the lockdown is disproportionate. And that the lockdowns are unlawfully picking economic winners and losers. They are correct to oppose the lockdown on this basis.
https://www.mininggazette.com/news/2021/01/baraga-county-officials-we-wont-enforce-covid-restrictions/

(24) In 2017 and 2018 - two years before COVID-19 - hundreds of millions of PCR test kits for COVID-19 were distributed worldwide.
The WITS web site tracks and lists many global transactions every year. The evidence for this has been preserved and distributed on the Internet. Its available here at 2017 and 2018 Test Kits for covid19
This baffling data was discovered by someone on September 5, 2020, who posted it on social media. It went viral all over the world. The next day, on September 6 the WITS suddenly changed the original label 'COVID-19' into the vague term 'Medical Test Kits'. At first they however forgot to delete one detail: the bottom of the webpage still showed the product code for these 'Medical Test Kits': 300215 which means 'COVID-19 Test Kits'.A few weeks later the HS code was also changed by the WITS to 'Medical Test Kit'. Their cover up came too late: this critical information was uncovered and is being revealed by millions worldwide.


This suggests prior knowledge of the covid19 pandemic. Some persons knew about it 2 years before it began. This will require criminal investigations in many countries and court orders of Discovery to establish all of the facts of this case.

(25) Legal cases and court cases in other countries

In the Netherlands, a court ruled that the curfew and lockdown there was unConstitutional and illegal on Tuesday 16h February, 2021. This ended the curfew there. This was a major victory for Democracy and Freedom in the Netherlands. This can serve as a court precedent for other European countries.
https://www.euronews.com/2021/02/16/the-netherlands-must-lift-curfew-immediately-as-hague-ruling-says-government-response-ille
https://www.google.com/search?&q=curfew+netherlands

In Britain court cases are proceeding against the lockdowns.
https://lockdownsceptics.org/2021/02/15/latest-news-286/#judicial-reviews-against-the-government
https://christianconcern.com/ccpressreleases/scottish-church-leaders-launch-legal-action-over-unlawful-closures-and-criminalisation-of-public-worship

In the USA, court cases are being taken throughout the USA against the lockdowns
https://www.constitutionallawgroup.us/

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the closing of the churches in New York state under lockdown laws is unConstitutional and illegal, and this law has been struck down. Religious freedom is protected US under the Constitution.
Splitting 5 to 4, Supreme Court Backs Religious Challenge to Cuomo’s Virus Shutdown Order, New York Times, November 26th 2020

(26) Massive Economic Losses and Financial Losses caused by Lockdowns to Ireland and other countries
The lockdowns have caused the closure and bankruptcy of thousands of businesses in Ireland and in other countries. The world economy lost $9 trillion or 6% of global GDP in 2020, and the loss in terms of GDP will be easily $50 trillion over the coming decade according to top economic forecasts, the Irish economy that is the non IT and Pharmaceuticals sectors shrunk by over 10% in 2020, national GDP fell by 3%, unemployment reached 20% in 2020, the government deficit increased to 19 billion euros and national debt has risen to over 230 billion euros. This will lead to deep recession in Ireland, and to higher taxes and more cutbacks in Ireland, which means more theft and robbery from the Irish taxpayers. More lockdowns in 2021 will worsen this. The lockdown adversely affects the property rights of people and the right to earn a living which are protected by the Constitution. The imposition of massive financial losses on thousands of Irish businesses and workers and on the Irish people and nation through disproprtionate and unConstitutional lockdowns is both a civil matter and criminal matter for the courts.
Another valid reason for a court to strike down and cancel the lockdown law or guidelines.


Section 2 of Legal case : Constitutional rights, Legal rights, Natural Law rights and Human Rights being breached by the lockdowns which are Disproportionate in Law and the Legal Remedies sought in Court

The points 1 to 21 above clearly prove that the lockdowns were disproportionate in law. This caused serious breaches of the Constitutional rights, Legal rights, Natural Law rights and Human Rights of the Irish people. The legal remedies sought in court include:

- strike down and cancellation of the lockdowns
- compensation to those parties who suffered financial losses due to the lockdowns or suffered illness or a worsneing of illness due to lockdowns or death of family members due to the lockdowns or suffered false arrests, imprisonment and prosecutions due to the lockdowns
- reinstatement of the good name and character of those persons who were falsely arrested and prosecuted for asserting their natural, constitutional and legal rights during the lockdown
- criminal charges against those who imposed these lockdowns and infringed the Constitutional rights, Legal rights, Natural Law rights and Human Rights rights of others.
- criminal charges against those who had conflicts of interest, acted corruptly, and misadvised or misled the government.
- official censure of and official investigation of the mainstream press and media to uncover bias, lies, misdirection, and censorship and how this contributed to the imposition of lockdowns.
- the implementation of the Great Barrington Declaration which is a proportionate legal response to covid19

The relevant Constitutional rights, Legal rights, Natural Law rights and Human Rights are outlined for the Court below.

(1) Natural Law is the highest form of law ; Natural Law predates and is superior to Constitutional law and to positive law created by politicians such as the lockdown law. Natural Law includes our inalienable rights and imprescriptible rights, which are rights we are all born with, and which cannot be denied to us by laws created by politicians. The government cannot take away inalienable and imprescriptible rights, whether through lockdown laws or any other laws. These inalienable and imprescriptible rights include the right to freedom of travel, to bodily integrity, to life and liberty, to freedom of religion, to freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of expression, freedom to earn an honest living, freedom of assembly and freedom of conscience. Many Constitutions in democracies worldwide were derived out of Natural Law which existed long before such Constitutions. The English Constitution, Irish Constitution and many other Constitutions have affirmed the pre-existence and supremacy of Natural Law.

Blackstone, the famous judge, jurist and legal writer says that:
'this law of nature, being coeval with mankind and dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all their force, and all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original'

The US Declaration of Independence in 1776 derived it's authority from Natural law, and contains references to Natural Law. The Irish Proclamation of Independence in 1916 and the formation of the first Dail (Irish parliament), the first Constitution of the Dail 1919-21, the Declaration of Irish Independence by the Dail and the Democratic Programme of the First Dail all derived their authority from Natural Law and used it to justify themselves. Constitutions have tried to codify some of the Natural law, such as the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment to the Constitution in the USA and the first Constitution of the Dail 1919-21 and the 1937 Constitution in Ireland. The US Declaration of Independence in 1776 declared that the Laws of Nature and of God give nations and peoples their democratic rights, human rights and freedoms. And that these rights are inalienable. The video below is a recitation of the US Declaration of Independence by President John F. Kennedy



Natural Rights are widely seen and interpreted as Universal and apply to all of humanity. The UN Declaration of Human Rights refers to Natural Law in it's preamble and attempted to codify some of the Natural Law. Article 40.3 of the Irish constitution refers to and accounts for the recognition of unenumerated rights, which derive from the Natural Law. For approximately 40 years, as a result of these unenumerated rights, the Irish courts have engaged in a process of enumerating constitutional rights, often by reference to the Natural Law.

The Natural Law has been upheld in courts in Europe and North America for over 250 years. In Ireland, Natural Law, in the form of fundamental rights and unenumerated rights, has been upheld many times in the courts. Examples include McGee v. The Attorney General, Ryan v Attorney General, Cox v Ireland, Kennedy v Ireland, Attorney General v X, The State (Healy) v Donoghue, State (Trimbole) v Governor of Mountjoy Prison, A. v The Governor of Arbour Hill Prison, McKinley v Minister for Defence, G v An Bord Uchtála, NHV v Minister for Justice, Byrne v Ireland, AM v Refugee Appeals Tribunal, Merriman v Fingal County Council, Carter v Minister for Education and Skills

In McGee v. The Attorney General, Justice Walsh acknowledged that natural rights are not created by law but that the Constitution confirms their existence and gives them protection. The Constitution itself concedes their existence:

'Articles 40, 41, 42 and 44 of the Constitution all fall within that section of the Constitution which is titled “Fundamental Rights.” Articles 41, 42 and 43 emphatically reject the theory that there are no rights without laws, no rights contrary to the law and no rights anterior to the law. They indicate that justice is placed above the law and acknowledge that natural rights, or human rights, are not created by law but that the Constitution confirms their existence and gives them protection. The individual has natural and human rights over which the State has no authority; and the family, as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of society, has rights as such which the State cannot control. ... Both in its preamble and in Article 6, the Constitution acknowledges God as the ultimate source of all authority.
The natural or human rights to which I have referred earlier in this judgment are part of what is generally called the natural law. There are many to argue that natural law may be regarded only as an ethical concept and as such is a re-affirmation of the ethical content of law in its ideal of justice. The natural law as a theological concept is the law of God promulgated by reason and is the ultimate governor of all the laws of men. In view of the acknowledgment of Christianity in the preamble and in view of the reference to God in Article 6 of the Constitution, it must be accepted that the Constitution intended the natural human rights I have mentioned as being in the latter category rather than simply an acknowledgment of the ethical content of law in its ideal of justice.'

In McGee v Attorney General, Justice Walsh also took the view that
' In this country it falls finally upon the judges to interpret the constitution and in doing so determine... the rights which are superior or antecedent to positive law or which are imprescriptible and inalienable '

In Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IR 294, Justice Kenny said:
“Natural law is both anterior and superior to positive law or man made law. There are many personal rights of the citizen which follow from the Christian and democratic nature of the State which are not mentioned in Art 40 at all.”

This view was adopted and expanded in State (Healy) v Donoghue where Justice Gannon noted, the existence of Natural Law rights:
“Which are anterior to and do not merely derive from the Constitution.”

Mr. Justice Costello made an important point about Natural Law several years after the McGee v. The Attorney General case:
' It has more than once been judicially observed that it can clearly be inferred that the Constitution rejects legal positivism as a basis for the protection of fundamental rights and suggests instead a theory of natural law from which those rights can be derived. '
Source: “Natural Law, the Constitution and the Courts” in Lynch and Meenan eds, Essays in Memory of Alexis Fitzgerald(The Incorporated Law Society of Ireland, 1987) 105, at 109.

In AM v Refugee Appeals Tribunal, Justice McDermott stated:
' Freedom of individual conscience underpins many of the democratic values and fundamental rights of the Constitution. The right to vote, to participate as a candidate in any form of election, the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly and religious freedom are all dependent on the freely exercised will and conscience of the individual. Though it is not recognised as a separate fundamental right under the Constitution, it is clearly part of the constitutional fabric and, as such, is, I am satisfied, an unenumerated right guaranteed by Article 40.3 of the Constitution '

In NHV v Minister for Justice, Justice Donnell stated:
' a right to work at least in the sense of a freedom to work or seek employment is a part of the human personality and accordingly the Article 40.1 requirement that individuals as human persons are required be held equal before the law, means that those aspects of the right which are part of human personality '

In Merriman v Fingal County Council, the High Court (Barrett J) made reference to a number of international conventions, including the Aarhus Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights, in identifying an unenumerated ‘right to an environment consistent with human dignity and the well-being of citizens at large’. Similarly, in Carter v Minister for Education and Skills, the High Court (Humphreys J) cited the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,the ICESCR and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in finding that an unenumerated right to third level education existed as a logical corollary of the previously identified right to earn a livelihood.

In Byrne v Ireland, which has ramifications for lockdown laws, the following was stated by the Judge:
' It is as much a duty of the state to render justice against itself in favour of citizens as it is to administer the same between private individuals. The adjudication of such claims by their nature belong to the judicial power of government ... the whole tenor of our Constitution is to the effect that there is no power, institution, or person in the land free of the law save where such immunity is expressed, or provided for, in the Constitution itself.'

Both Mr. Justice Walsh, and Mr Justice Costello, two of Ireland's most prominent judges strongly supported Natural Law and publicly stated that some parts of the Constitution (fundamental rights) were derived from Natural law and that Natural law was anterior to positive law and superior to positive law. And that this was important in dealing with unjust laws.

Unjust laws have been struck down or over-ridden or rejected by the superior courts in judgments in the past for breaching the Natural Law and the Irish Constitution and it's fundamental rights which derive from the Natural Law. The legal Latin term 'Lex iniusta non est lex' (An unjust law is no law at all) has been used in the past in the context of Natural Law and its presence within Constitutions and Human Rights laws, to reject, over-ride or overturn unjust laws and this continues to be used in courts today. It is an important safeguard against a return to Nazism, Fascism, Theocracy, Apartheid, Slavery or Bonded labour, Imperialism and Colonialism also known as Globalism today, Military Dictatorship, and Communism and the unjust laws which these regimes make 'legal' and enforceable in their courts. These oppressive and dictatorial ideologies misused, subverted and undermined democracy to gain power within countries in the past ; democracy remains vulnerable to this type of attack in the modern world. And there are risks to Democracies such as Ireland today. An unjust law such as national lockdowns and severe social restrictions very similar to Fascism and Communism in 2020 and 2021 which were disproportionate in law are a prime example of unjust laws. Natural Law is enforceable in the Irish courts. Natural Law is superior to Constitutional law and to positive law created by politicians such as the lockdown law. The lockdown law directly breaches Natural Law and the Irish Constitution and it's fundamental rights which derive from the Natural Law and should be struck down by a court on that basis.

(2) the original lockdown legislation in March 2020 in and of itself deals with an Emergency situation, similar to world war or an armed rebellion or civil war, requiring lockdown of the country, house arrests and a police state, and suspension of many Constitutional, legal rights and human rights. Thus it comes under the remit of Article 28.3 of the Constitution. This has been upheld in prior court judgments in relation to the second world war and the Irish civil war at the foundation of the Irish state. Commonly called ‘Emergency Powers’. The present legislation exists under Article 15 of the Constitution, and confers ordinary law making powers but does not apply here as we are dealing with extraordinary laws, extraordinary law making powers, ‘Emergency Powers’ and extraordinary circumstances identical in their effects to world war or an armed rebellion or civil war. The lockdown law can be struck down on this basis.
A similar lockdown law passed in January 2021 confers similar powers and suffers from the same legal defects. Ireland was not in a state of war or Emergency in 2020 and 2021. The scientific, medical, epidemiological and statistical facts prove this and also prove that lockdowns are disproportionate in law.
Another valid reason for a court to strike down and cancel the lockdown law or guidelines.

(3) The human rights guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and UN Declaration of Human Rights have been breached in Ireland by the lockdown law and during the lockdowns, and these rights apply during times of Emergency such as a world war or regional war or an armed rebellion or civil war, and during times of lockdown. This has been affirmed in court cases since 1945 and in the Nuremberg Principles. These human rights treaties and Principles are legally binding in Ireland. Courts in Ireland have upheld the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and UN Declaration of Human Rights ; see NHV v Minister for Justice, AM v Refugee Appeals Tribunal, Merriman v Fingal County Council, Carter v Minister for Education and Skills.
Innocent people in Ireland have been arrested, detained, assaulted, prosecuted, jailed, fined, harassed and bullied, threatened, socially excluded and discriminated against, physically or verbally attacked, censored in the press and media, subjected to mass house arrests and curfews, illegally spied on, their privacy and data protection rights breached, and fired from jobs under the lockdown laws and accompanying restrictions. These are serious breaches of human rights.
The lockdown law can be struck down on this basis.

(4) Fundamental Rights under Articles 40 - 44 of the Irish Constitution
The lockdown law breaches these Fundamental rights which are protected by the Irish Constitution, and lockdown law should be struck down and cancelled on this basis.

• The right to life. Thousands of people are being deprived of important medical diagnosis in hospitals and clinics and important treatments and surgeries due to lockdowns. Thousands of people will die from this. In the circumstsances this may constitute manslaughter or murder. Serious breaches of this Constitutional right. And the criminal courts may also have to adjudicate on this.
  
  In addition to this, the Irish government, the Regulators and management of nursing homes bear responsibility for the high number of deaths in nursing homes. Approximately 62% of all covid19 deaths were in nursing homes in Ireland. The facts in relation to this are outlined on https://www.data-analytica.org/index.htm#nursing Serious breaches of this Constitutional right. And the criminal courts may also have to adjudicate on this.
  
  
• The right to bodily integrity.Under Article 40 of the Irish Constitution all citizens have a right to bodily integrity. Thousands of people were and are being deprived of important medical diagnosis in hospitals and clinics and important treatments and surgeries due to lockdowns. This includes cancelled hospital appointments and procedures for cancers, heart diseases, respiratory diseases, diabetes, organ failures, mental illness and suicide risks, dementia and alzheimers, and chronic illnesses. Thousands of people will suffer a worsening of their illnesses and diseases and injuries from this. In the circumstsances this constitutes grevious bodily harm and death in many cases and is a direct violation of bodily integrity. Serious breaches of this Constitutional right. The criminal courts may also have to adjudicate on this.
  And also the forced wearing of masks may be an interference with bodily integrity. This is particularly the case if masks cause a worsening of one's existing illness or new illnesses such as bacterial pneumonia.
  And also the forced wearing of masks may be an interference with bodily integrity. This is particularly the case if masks cause a worsening of one's existing illness or new illnesses such as bacterial pneumonia.
• Freedom to travel. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns. This is analysed further in section 6 below. .
• Equality before the law. Some privileged persons are above the law and not subject to lockdowns. This was widely reported in the press and media in 2020. It also includes politicians and their "advisors". Some persons such as government ministers can breach the law, the Constitution, the Natural law, Human Rights laws and the Criminal Law and they are not being held accountable and not being restrained in their unlawful activities. See the case Byrne v Ireland.
• Personal liberty. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns, particularly in the area of Human Rights and Fundamental Rights.
• Freedom of expression and Freedom of the Press. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns and accompanying censorship by government bodies and by the press and media. Censorship in the mainstream press and media, state media and online on social media during the lockdowns has blocked freedom of expression.
• Freedom of assembly. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns.
• Freedom of association. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns.
• Religious liberty. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns. The government and police have forced the closure of churches for many months and severe restrictions on religious services.This is analysed further in section 7 below.
• The rights of the family. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns. This is analysed further in section 6 below.
• The right to education for children. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns and school closures and cancellation of examinations. And the unavailability of broadband in many rurual areas and the lack of computers for online learning among poorer households.This is analysed further in section 8 below.
• Property rights. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns, and their adverse effects on businesses, business people, investors, wage earners, property rentals, and property transactions.
• The right to earn a livelihood. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns through forced closures of businesses and high unemployment between 20% and 30% in 2020 and into 2021.
• Inviolability of dwelling. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns in the sense that people are prevented from visiting each other and also the police and doctors can forcefully enter a dwelling under the lockdown laws.
• The right to fair procedures. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns. People are being falsely arrested and prosecuted for engaging in their Constitutional rights, and being prevented from seeking redress in the superior courts for breaches of their Constitutional rights, Natural Law rights and Human Rights at affordable cost. And lockdowns are severely undermining the operation of the courts and the hearing of cases.
• The right to privacy. This is obviously breached by the lockdowns as the state is using intrusive methods to police and enforce the lockdowns. And innocent persons are being stopped and required to provide personal details to police, despite not being involved in crime.

(5) An important legal precedent was set in Germany where a regional lockdown was declared unConstitutional in January 2021. This precedent can be used in other European courts. Decisions in Germany are important due to their great efforts to avoid repeating nazi Germany. And this has important lessons for other courts and countries around Europe.
‘Catastrophically wrong’: German court declares regional lockdown UNCONSTITUTIONAL in ‘politically explosive’ decision
RT.com

(6) The 13th Amendment to the Irish Constitution and Article 40.3.3º gives persons the right to travel
This provision of the Constitution is being breached by the lockdown law and guidelines. The Constitution is superior to all positive law, including the covid19 laws and guidelines. Another valid reason for a court to strike down and cancel the lockdown law or guidelines.

(7) The Right to Bodily Integrity under the Irish Constitution
Under Article 40 of the Irish Constitution all citizens have a right to bodily integrity. Thousands of people were and are being deprived of important medical diagnosis in hospitals and clinics and important treatments and surgeries due to lockdowns. This includes cancelled hospital appointments and procedures for cancers, heart diseases, respiratory diseases, diabetes, organ failures, mental illness and suicide risks, dementia and alzheimers, and chronic illnesses. Thousands of people will suffer a worsening of their illnesses and diseases and injuries from this. In the circumstsances this constitute grevious bodily harm and death in many cases and is a direct violation of bodily integrity. The criminal courts may also have to adjudicate on this.
The Nuremberg Code and Principles may also apply here.
And also the forced wearing of masks may be an interference with bodily integrity. This is particularly the case if masks cause a worsening of one's existing illness or new illnesses such as bacterial pneumonia.
The lockdown law can be struck down on this basis.

(8) Under Article 41.1 of the Irish Constitution
'The State recognises the Family as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of Society, and as a moral institution possessing inalienable and imprescriptible rights, antecedent and superior to all positive law.'
The Constitutional rights for the family override positive law such as the lockdown regulations and laws passed in 2020 and in 2021. These constitutional rights are guaranteed by the Constitution. The Constitution is superior to all positive law, including the covid19 laws and guidelines. The lockdown breached these Constitutional rights of the family. The lockdowns directly led to a massive increase in domestic violence in families in Ireland. This has been confirmed in police reports, Dept. of Justice reports and news reports in the mainstream press. The lockdown led to and wil lead to an increase in family breakdowns, seperations and divorces both during the lockdown phases and after. The lockdowns deprived families of the right to earn a living, the rights of children in families to get an education, and the rights of family members to travel and visit each other. These are serious breaches of Article 41 of the Constitution.
The lockdown laws and regulations can be struck down on this basis.

(9) Under Article 44 of the Irish Constitution
There is freedom of religion and a seperation of church and state. The state cannot dictate to the church and vice versa. The Constitution is superior to all positive law, including the covid19 laws and guidelines.The lockdown law and regulations have breached this Constitutional article and can be struck down on this basis. A court precedent has been set by the US Supreme court during the lockdown there in November 2020. In the USA, the US Supreme Court has ruled that the closing of the churches in New York state under lockdown laws is unConstitutional and illegal, and this law has been struck down. Religious freedom is protected US under the Constitution.
Splitting 5 to 4, Supreme Court Backs Religious Challenge to Cuomo’s Virus Shutdown Order, New York Times, November 26th 2020

The English and Welsh governmens have allowed churches to remain open under the current lockdown, and this is the case internationally. In November 2020, Chancellor Angela Merkel refused to close churches in Germany due to ‘constitutional issues’. Earlier in 2021 a French high court branded government church closures as unlawful and overturned the ban.

(10) Article 42 of the Irish Constitution
Under Article 42 of the Irish Constitution, children have a right to education. The lockdown has shut down the schools and stopped important examinations. Many homes do not have reliable broadband connections and / or do not have computers for online classes. The lockdown law and regulations have breached this Constitutional article and can be struck down on this basis.

(11) Under Article 40.3 of the Irish Constitution
1° The State guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate the personal rights of the citizen.
2° The State shall, in particular, by its laws protect as best it may from unjust attack and, in the case of injustice done, vindicate the life, person, good name, and property rights of every citizen.
This includes enumerated and unenumerated rights which are being clearly denied by the lockdown. The lockdown law and regulations have breached this Constitutional article and can be struck down on this basis.

(12) Under Article 45 of the Irish Constitution
"The principles of social policy set forth in this Article are intended for the general guidance of the Oireachtas. The application of those principles in the making of laws shall be the care of the Oireachtas exclusively, and shall not be cognisable by any Court under any of the provisions of this Constitution."
The High Court and Supreme Court can make a judgment regarding whether or not the Oireachtas followed these Principles in the making of their laws, especially the lockdown laws. The inclusion of this Article in the Constitution is a statement that these principles or social policies are relevent, that they apply in society, and have some basis in law as they are converted or transcribed into laws, and thus the Oireachtas has a Constitutional duty to follow these principles in their law making. It is valid to see if the Oireachtas is doing this or not. A serious breach of these principles in the form of oppressive new laws may constitute a breach of Article 45 of the Constitution.
The lockdown law can be struck down on this basis.

(13) Article 40 of the Irish Constitution: Freedom speech and freedom of the press.
guarantees freedom of expression and freedom of the press. I cite a famous US Supreme Court judge:
“If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the process of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.”
Justice Louis D. Brandeis, Whitney v. California, (1927)

The censorship of the press and media in Ireland, particularly state media and private media funded by the state during covid19 lockdowns and the deliberate blocking and prevention of the alternative views of top scientists and doctors in the press and media, and the threats against such doctors and scientists, was a direct breach of Article 40 of the Constitution. This is especaily the case where the welfare of the vast majority of Irish people, the nation is at stake, and vast financial losses and deaths from many illnesses will result from certain action or actions such as lockdowns. The public have a right to be fully informed and to act through fully informed consent not to be propagandised and brainwashed.
The lockdown law can be struck down on this basis.

(14) The Irish Constitution and Proportional measures
The Irish Constitution gives the state the right to protect and vindicate the right to life, right to travel, right of assembly, right to congregate in groups and organisations, right to earn a living, right to religious services, right to education, and right to bodily integrity of citizens. But, the rights of a tiny minority cannot be allowed prejudice or cancel out the rights of the many according to court judgments in the past, and this may apply to national lockdowns or regional lockdowns. For example, consider:

(a) those persons who have recovered from covid19 as confirmed in the antigen test (no active infection) and antibody test ( previous infection defeated by the immune system)
(b) children who have been found to be immune from the illness
(c) those who are healthy and not infected, and have pre-existing immunity to coronviruses including covid19.
(d) those who are healthy and have strong immune systems and are not in the vulnerable groups (over 70 and / or those people with two or more pre-existing illnesses)
(e) the high rate of False Positives which has created unnecessary public fear, panic and paranoia and undermined the government's policies and law-making efforts.

Why should the lives and Constitutional rights and human rights of the vast majority of citizens be denied, blocked, and undermined in order to protect a tiny minority who already have effective medicines and vaccines for the covid19 illness ?
The lockdown law can be struck down on this basis.

(15) Mandatory Vaccines for covid19 are unConstitutional and also against the Ruling of the Council of Europe and against The Nuremberg Code and Principles
Under the 34th Amendment to the Irish Constitution and Article 40 of the Constitution all citizens have a right to bodily integrity.
On 27 January, the Council of Europe signed Resolution 2361, which states that vaccinations in EU Member States should not be mandatory. Furthermore, persons who have not been vaccinated may not be discriminated against in any way. This effectively stops the notion of "vaccine passports"... Point 7.3 of the resolution obliges all Member States to ensure that citizens are informed that Covid vaccinations are NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially or otherwise pressured to be vaccinated. Secondly -- at least as important -- Member States must ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated because of possible health risks or because the person simply does not want to be vaccinated.' The Council of Europe Ruling is included in news reports and EU report below. The Nuremberg Code and Principles also bans mandatory vaccines especially experimental vaccines such as mRNA which have not been fully tested for safety and long term side effects.
News Reports: https://www.ticinolibero.ch/attualita/cronaca/1489155/nessuno-dovra-essere-discriminato-se-non-vaccinato-il-passaporto-vaccinale-non-passa-a-bruxelles
https://pace.coe.int/en/files/29004

The Nuremberg Code



During World War II medical experiments were conducted on prisoners in the concentration camps. After the war, anyone involved in these experiments was prosecuted in the Nuremberg trials. The Nuremberg Code was written to prevent criminal medical experiments on people in the future. According to this internationally recognized code, the voluntary and informed consent of the human subject is absolutely essential in any medical experiment. Use of deception, lies, disinformation or no safety information, coercion, manipulation, denial of human rights, denial of Constitutional rights to force people to take vaccines breaches the The Nuremberg Code
Since the covid vaccines are listed as medical experiments, administering them without the persons full consent is a violation of the Nuremberg Code.
Download the Nuremberg code here

Legal Issues about covid19 vaccine for Criminal Courts and Civil courts
Vaccines are not safe and not effective, Mises Institute, USA
5 Questions Fauci and FDA Need to Answer on Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccines
The Defender January 2021
Deaths and injuries from covid19 vaccines - www.data-analytica.org/page2.htm

Historical Precedents of Wrong Doing and abuses of Constitutional and Legal Rights
Vaccine Trials and the Mother and Baby Home Scandal in Ireland:
It has emerged that thousands of children in mother and baby homes, orphanages and industrial schools were used as human guinea pigs in vaccine trials in Ireland. There are state investigations into deaths of children in these institutions.
Doctors paid thousands for mother and baby home trials, The Times, January 17th 2021
GSK won’t commit to redress for children forced into vaccine trials in mother and baby homes,The Times, January 17th 2021
Report Gives Glimpse Into Horrors of Ireland’s Mother and Baby Homes : A government commission found high death rates, unethical vaccine trials and traumatic living conditions at 18 homes that housed unwed mothers up until the 1990s. New York Times, January 12th 2021

(16) Constructive Denial of Constitutional Rights. This is where the state or a private business / organisation illegally and unlawfully uses threats to deprive a person of his/her Constitutional rights if he/she refuses to take something or do something which the person believes is harmful, unConstitutional, unlawful and illegal. Examples would be mandatory vaccines, unConstitutional national lockdowns and curfews, false arrests, prosecutions, imprisonment and fines, 'health passports', 'health certificates', threats of dismissal from a job, denial of mortgages or housing, participation in corrupt and criminal courts or tribunals where criminality has been proven, denial of entry to bars and restaurants, removal of one's children, unjustified social restrictions, etc.. This is similar to Constructive Dismissal in employment law. This may be both a civil offence and a criminal offence. The lockdown law can be struck down on this basis.

(17) The deprivation of or breach of or forceful denial of or attack on the Constitutonal rights and/or Human Rights of a person(s) is a criminal offence. It deliberately seeks to deprive the person of their Constitutional rights. Harassment of an individual while doing this is also a criminal offence. State employees need to be aware of this. The lockdown law can be struck down on this basis

(18) Under the United Nations’ Covenant on Civil and Political rights, it is incumbent on any government imposing disease control measures to utilize the “least restrictive means” available to effectively achieve the public health goal. This is a legally binding treaty in Ireland and other countries. Ireland and several other countries have breached this Covenant.
Another valid reason for a court to strike down and cancel the lockdown law or guidelines.

(19) the Conflicts of Interest of government advisors and NPHET and also the scientific and medical professionals interviewed on the state television and radio station RTE in relation to lockdowns, vaccines and covid19. These conflicts of interest need to be made public.These conflicts of interest must include family members and business partners and associates and all investors. These were the people who pushed hardest for lockdowns and had the most to gain financially from such measures. Their power was disproportionate and open to abuse.There is some evidence of conflicts of interest presented on www.data-analytica.org/page2.htm The old legal dictum of 'follow the money' may be necessary here to establish the unusual reasons for imposing disproportionate lockdowns which destroy economies and societies.
The role of Conflicts of Interest in misadvising governments, lobbying and manipulating governments, and the creation of laws which enforce lockdowns could be used to strike down and cancel the lockdown laws. And in some cases bring criminal charges against people.

(20) The Criminalisation of Innocent People
Those persons facing arrest, court appearances, prosecution, jail or fines in the criminal courts for breaking lockdown laws should ask the judge to adjourn the court case or suspend judgment until after the High Court cases against the lockdown are finished and the criminal cases against the lockdown are finished.

These criminal cases should be struck out of the courts as they involve serious breaches of a person's Constitutional Rights, Natural law Rights and Human Rights and the criminalisation of innocent people.

(21) The legal arguments presented in an important legal paper by a Barrister Mr. Francis Hoar in Britain –‘ A disproportionate interference: the Coronavirus Regulations and the ECHR’ can be used in court. He states that the lockdown can be challenged and overturned for breaking EU laws and UN human rights laws, the Siracusa Principles and Constitutional rights. The same applies in Ireland and other democratic countries.
There are several Judicial Reviews against the lockdown and other measures in the courts in Britain in Winter 2020 and into 2021, see the following link https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/11/16/latest-news-195/#judicial-reviews-against-the-government The legal arguments presented in these court cases may also apply in Ireland and other countries.
Another valid reason for a court to strike down and cancel the lockdown law or guidelines

(22). The legal arguments and public statements of ex Supreme Court judge Lord Sumption in Britain can be used in courts to state that lockdowns were a disproportionate response to covid19 and that they were unConstitutional, illegal and unlawful. His knowledge of the law, including international law, and his status as a Supreme Court judge gives him credibility. Some of these public statements are on www.data-analytica.org/page3.htm
Another valid reason for a court to strike down and cancel the lockdown law or guidelines.

(23) The deaths from the covid19 vaccines and serious side effects and injuries caused by these vaccines mentioned on www.data-analytica.org/page2.htm involve serious breaches of the criminal laws, human rights, the Constitution and The Nuremberg Code and Principles. And forcing people to get vaccines if they want to travel abroad or work or attend schools / colleges or end the lockdowns also involves similar breaches.

(24) The criminal laws and The Nuremberg Code and Principles may also apply if this viral pandemic was caused deliberately or by accident or covered up with the result that millions of lives were adversely affected and thousands of people died worldwide. This may also have implications for governments and so called “advisors” or “experts” who have conflicts of interest.

(25) The Great Barrington Declaration authored by Professors of Medicine from Oxford, Harvard and Stanford and signed by many thousands of medical doctors and scientists worldwide provided an Alternative to Lockdowns. Implementing he Great Barrington Declaration would reduce the risk of infection and transmission AND would not prejudice or cancel out the rights of anyone or any group in society. It would be proportionate and would serve the Common Good and the Public Interest, and would enable people to go back to work, Universities and schools and businesses to re-open and for the economy to recover.
This Great Barrington Declaration is a Proportionate Response to Covid19. It was presented to the Irish government and Irish Parliament in Autumn 2020. They ignored it and refused to debate it in the Irish Parliament.
Another valid reason for a court to strike down and cancel the lockdown law or guidelines.

These 48 factors above show that lockdowns were unnecessary and disproportionate, and breaches of the Natural Law, the Constitution and Human Rights Laws, UN treaties and the Nuremburg Code. This was particularly true from June 2020 onwards. Other factors include:

• Lockdowns are being accompanied by unsafe vaccines. In some cases they are mandatory. Mandatory vaccines are unConstitutional as persons have a right to bodily integrity. Obstructing or undermining a person's Constitutional rights if a person does not take a vaccine is Constructive Denial of a Person's Constitutional rights and this can be brought to court. This would be similar to Constructive Dismissal.

Lockdowns from June 2020 onwards were disproportionate in law and worked against the Public Interest and against the Common Good as understood by the Irish Constitution. People should not have their Constitutional right to freedom of movement, freedom to earn a living, freedom of speech and expression, freedoms of the family, the right to life and bodily integrity (free from unsafe vaccines), and their Human Rights deprived and blocked by the state in light of the present medical and scientific facts and evidence about covid19. 

The Great Barrington Declaration authored by Professors of Medicine from Oxford, Harvard and Stanford and signed by thousands of medical doctors and scientists worldwide provided an Alternative to Lockdowns. It is possible to quarantine or cocoon infected people and those people most at risk of death, such as those over 70 and those with pre-existing illnesses, while allowing healthy non infected people and recovered people (over 95% of people) to work and to lead normal lives while social distancing and wearing masks and gloves in nursing homes and hospitals. Those healthy people who have had antibody tests which show they have antibodies against covid19 and are recovered would not be required to wear masks and socially distance. Infected people and the elderly and vulnerable and staff working in hospitals and nursing homes could be required by law to wear masks and gloves. The infected, the elderly and vulnerable would be quarantined and be given effective medicines (see above) and special diets to strengthen their immune systems. This would not prejudice the rights of anyone or any group in society. It would serve the Common Good and the Public Interest, and would enable businesses to re-open and for the economy to recover.

Tracey O'Mahony and her legal team are bringing a legal case against the Lockdowns in the High Court in Ireland. They are raising funds for the legal case online through Crowd Funding, see link below
https://ie.gofundme.com/f/erosion-of-fundamental-freedoms

• Legal Precedents
  Portuguese Court rules PCR test is unreliable as evidence for covid19 infection and illness
  An important ruling by a Portuguese court stated that PCR tests are not reliable and cannot be used as evidence of covid19 infection and illness. This revolves around the fact PCR is not specific for covid19, does not isolate the virus, does not identify viral load, uses too many cycles, and only identifies fragments of a coronavirus and has too many false positives.
  
  Citing Jaafar et al. (2020;), the court concluded that “if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is <3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.” The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown
  Citing Surkova et al. (2020)), the court further stated that any diagnostic test must be interpreted in the context of the actual probability of disease as assessed prior to the undertaking of the test itself, and expresses the opinion that “in the current epidemiological landscape of the United Kingdom, the likelihood is increasing that Covid 19 tests are returning false positives, with major implications for individuals, the health system and society.”
  
  “Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.”
  Sources: Portuguese court ruling on PCR tests and https://lockdownsceptics.org/2020/11/16/latest-news-195/#portuguese-appeals-court-deems-pcr-tests-unreliable
  
  
  
• Tracey O'Mahony and her legal team are bringing a legal case against the Lockdowns in the High Court in Ireland. They are raising funds for the legal case online through Crowd Funding, see link below
  https://ie.gofundme.com/f/erosion-of-fundamental-freedoms
  
  
  
  
  
• The views of Top Lawyers, Barristers and Judges regarding Covid19 Lockdowns and Proportionality in Law
  A well known German trial lawyer, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, is working with other lawyers to bring charges of 'crimes against humanity' and 'malfeasance' and "loss of income" against politicians and their "advisors" and state officials. They are using top medical doctors, scientists, and epidemiologists as expert witnesses in these legal cases. Class action legal cases and criminal cases are being prepared.
  
  
  
  Lord Sumption a former Supreme court judge in Britain has called the national lockdown there the biggest interference ever in the liberties and rights of British people and he strongly opposes it.
  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8281007/Former-Supreme-Court-judge-LORD-SUMPTION-gives-withering-critique-Governments-lockdown.html
  
  https://www.law.com/international-edition/2020/05/21/jonathan-sumption-a-response-to-my-critics-on-lockdown/?slreturn=20200422080637#
  
  https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/-this-is-how-freedom-dies-the-folly-of-britain-s-coercive-covid-strategy
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  An important legal paper was  published by a Barrister Mr. Francis Hoar in Britain in April 2020 – ‘ A disproportionate interference: the Coronavirus Regulations and the ECHR’.
  https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2020/04/21/a-disproportionate-interference-the-coronavirus-regulations-and-the-echr-francis-hoar/
  He states that the lockdown can be challenged and overturned for breaking EU and UN human rights laws, the Siracusa Principles and British Constitutional rights. The same applies in Ireland and other democratic countries.
  
  In Britain a group of lawyers, barristers, scientists and activists, The People's Brexit, are pursuing legal cases and petittions to end the lockdowns and end fascism there. Read The Coronavirus Act 2020 is Null and Void!
  
  Michael McDowell a top barrister in Ireland and also a senator in the Irish Senate has openly disputed the lockdown and the proportioanlity of the legal measures taken.
  Irish Times article 1
  Irish Times article 2
  
  Analysis by Tracey O'Mahony, a barrister in Ireland provides an in-depth legal analysis of proportionality
  
  An important legal report by Dr. Peter Breggin, a medical doctor and psychiatrist titled “COVID-19 & Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effects on Individuals, Institutions and Society” was filed in a federal court in Ohio, USA, on August 31, 2020, as part of a lawsuit and injunction to put an end to the state’s pandemic measures.
  
  A French court ruled in July 2020 that the mandatory wearing of masks in public during the covid19 episode breaches important legal rights and human rights. I have included a link to the web site of the court and the judgment in French and in English Court web site http://strasbourg.tribunal-administratif.fr/ English https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://strasbourg.tribunal-administratif.fr/content/download/171091/1705849/version/1/file/2003058-1.pdf&prev=search&pto=aue French http://strasbourg.tribunal-administratif.fr/content/download/171091/1705849/version/1/file/2003058-1.pdf
  
  
  

• Civil Cases in the High Courts and Criminal Cases in the Criminal Courts

  People need to take the following actions:
  
  Civil Cases in the High Courts involve breaches of Constitutional rights, UN and EU Human Rights, the Siracusa Principles, Nuremburg code, and the United Nations’ Covenant on Civil and Political rights. These may also include some breaches of the criminal laws, which can be referred on to the criminal courts. There is no legal immunity under the Nuremburg code and UN and EU Human Rights laws which have both civil and criminal aspects.
  
  Criminal cases in the criminal courts include

  • Fraud by False Representation. Includes promotion of false models and false predictions which proved to be wrong by several orders of magnitude. Misadvising the government. And these actions led to lockdowns which destroyed thousands of businesses and millions of jobs. And to the cancellation of many thousands of hospital appointment and deaths resulting from this and the increasd suicides caused by lockdowns.
  • Gross Negligence which caused massive economic losses. And to the cancellation of many thousands of hospital appointment and deaths resulting from this and the increasd suicides caused by lockdowns.
  • Malfeasance
  • Abuse of Public Office
  • Theft and Fraud Offences
  • Corruption Offences Laws
  • Falsifying Death Certificates and Causes of Death
  • Use of lies and deception by officials and state employees to create fear and panic in the general
    public and create a false need for lockdowns
    
  • Causing massive financial losses to businesses, businessmen and to workers
  • Collateral Damage caused by Lockdowns in many countries - https://collateralglobal.org
    This has been compiled by medical doctors, professors, scientists, immunologists, epidemiologists, statisticians, economists, lawyers and academics
  • causing large losses to the Revenue Comissioners
  • caused the deaths of many thousands of people who had their hospital appointments, diagnoses, screenings and treatments for cancers, heart diseases, respiratory diseases, neurological diseases, dementia, diabetes, endocrine diseases, acute infections, and chronic diseases and illnesses cancelled due to the lockdowns in 2020 and 2021. There is no legal immunity for manslaughter and murder and causing grevious bodily harm.
  • caused a worsening of mental illnesses, a neglect of treatment for such due to lockdowns and a higher rate of suicides due to lockdowns
  • caused a worsening of addictions for thousands of people and a worsening of domestic violence for thousands of people. These have inflicted significant physical injuries, trauma and financial losses on people.
  • false arrests, false fines and false imprisonments resulting from the physical enforcement of unConsitutional lockdown lockdown guidelines and laws which breach the Constitution, UN and EU Human Rights laws, UN treaties, Siracusa Principles and the Nuremburg code.
  • lying to or misleading the general public which may also constitute sedition in the sense that it has led to lockdowns which have overthrown democracy and Constitutional freedoms
  • conflicts of interest which had an adverse effect on the government, law making and the nation as a whole which may also constitute treason
  • Illegal censorship of the press and media which prevented a fair, factual, truthful and balanced debate about covid19, lockdowns and vaccines. This in turn breached the legal requirement of 'Informed Consent'.
    
  • Constructive Denial of Constitutional Rights. This is where the state ilegally and unlawfully uses threats to deprive a person of his/her Constitutional rights if he/she refuses to take something or do something which the person believes is harmful, unConstitutional, unlawful and illegal. Examples would be mandatory vaccines, unConstitutional national lockdowns and curfews, 'health passports', 'health certificates', threats of dismissal from a job, denial of mortgages or housing, participation in corrupt and criminal courts or tribunals where criminality has been proven, denial of entry to bars and restaurants, removal of one's children, unjustified social restrictions, etc.. This is similar to Constructive Dismissal in employment law. This may be both a civil offence and a criminal offence..
  • The deprivation of or breach of or forceful denial of or attack on the Constitutonal rights and/or Human Rights of a person(s) is a criminal offence. It deliberately seeks to deprive the person of their Constitutional rights. Harassment of an individual while doing this is also a criminal offence. State employees need to be aware of this.
  • the promotion of untested and unsafe vaccines. It normally takes 2 to 4 years to test vaccine safety. And mRNA vaccines are very new and experimental and have caused serious injuries to animals in the past. The facts and evidence are presented on www.data-analytica.org/page2.htm
  • vaccines which cause deaths or serious injuries. There is no legal immunity for manslaughter and murder and causing grevious bodily harm. And there is no legal immunity under the Nuremburg code and UN and EU Human Rights laws which have both civil and criminal aspects.
    
    This will require teams of lawyers and barristers, business people affected by these lockdowns and other restrictions, and experts such as scientists, medical doctors and epidemiologists and Whistleblowers in each country. Class actions will be necessary. There are many types of class actions which can be taken. Criminal investigations and prosecutions could also be undertaken.
    The following experts could provide expert testimony in courts
    Professor Michael Levitt the Nobel prize winner, Dr. Luc Montagnier another Nobel prize winner, Dr. Rashid Buttar and hundreds of his medical doctor friends in the USA, Dr. John Oxford, Dr. Joel Hay, Dr. Pablo Goldschmidt, Dr. Erich Bendavid, Dr. Yanis Roussel, Dr. Beda Stadler, Dr. Yoram Lass, Dr. Didier Raoult, Dr. Dolores Cahill, Dr. Zach Bush, Dr. Marcus De Brun, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Dr. Karin Molling, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Yannis Roussel, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Knut Wittkowski, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Professor Johan Giesecke, Professor Alexander Kekulé, Dr. Clare Craig, Dr. Frank Ulrich Montgomery, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Dr. Martin Kulldorf, Dr. David Katz, Dr. Michael Osterhold, Dr. Peter Goetzsche, Professor Erich Bendavid, Dr. Pietro Vernanzza, Professor John Ionnadis, Dr. Gerhard Krause, Professor Maria Gita Gismondo, Dr. Karina Reiss, Dr. Karl Probst, Dr. Heiko Schonning, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr. Martin Haditsch, Dr. Harold Lesch, Professor Stefan Hockerz, Professor Hendrik Streek, Dr. Carten Scheler, Dr. Carl Henaghan and researchers at the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine in Oxford, England.
    
    
• Holding Referendums to Overturn the Lockdown laws in Countries
  Many countries have a legal duty to hold a Referendum if the government or other legal authority receives a certain amount of signatures from its citizens. In January 2021 Switzerland became the first country in the world to hold a Referendum about this.
  Swiss to vote in referendum on government’s Covid restrictions, Financial Times, January 13th 2021
  
  
  
  
• Mandatory Vaccines OR Forcing Employees to take the Vaccine or Forcing Students to take the Vaccine
  The covid19 vaccine trials are mentioned on www.data-analytica.org/page2.htm and have been shown to have many side effects and present dangers to peoples health and lives. This threat to life and threat to one's health and well being from the rushed covid19 vaccine is serious. The government or state does not have the Constitutional right or legal right to enforce mandatory vaccinations for covid19, under article 41 of the Constitution, and this is especially the case for coronavirus vaccines (Mers, Sars vaccines) which have been proven to cause injury or deaths in the past. Every person has the Constitutional right to bodily integrity. This has been affirmed in court cases. The same is true in the legal systems of other countries.
  
  Vaccine Safety Deaths, Injuries and Court Cases involving Vaccines
  There is a high risk that vaccines for covid19 will seriously injure or kill people.These risks are listed here in Vaccine Safety section of this web site
  
  Legal Issues about covid19 vaccine for Criminal Courts and Civil courts
  5 Questions Fauci and FDA Need to Answer on Pfizer and Moderna COVID Vaccines
  The Defender January 2021
  
  Tracey O'Mahony, Barrister in Ireland explains legal issues around mandatory vaccines.
  
  
  Informed Consent of those who receive vaccines for covid19
  Legally the informed consent of all persons who receive vaccines for covid19 must be attained. Persons who are ignorant about the risks and dangers should not be given such vaccines. See the folowing scientific paper.
  Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease Cardozo et al. 2020. International Journal of Clinical Practice.
  
  Vaccine Trials and the Mother and Baby Home Scandal in Ireland
  It has emerged that thousands of children in mother and baby homes, orphanages and industrial schools were used as human guinea pigs in vaccine trials in Ireland. There are state investigations into deaths of children in these institutions.
  Doctors paid thousands for mother and baby home trials, The Times, January 17th 2021
  GSK won’t commit to redress for children forced into vaccine trials in mother and baby homes,The Times, January 17th 2021
  Report Gives Glimpse Into Horrors of Ireland’s Mother and Baby Homes : A government commission found high death rates, unethical vaccine trials and traumatic living conditions at 18 homes that housed unwed mothers up until the 1990s. New York Times, January 12th 2021
  

• The Police
  Constitutional law is superior to all positive law and Constitutional rights are superior to covid19 regulations and unConstitutional covid19 laws. The Police are there to serve the Constitution and the People and to protect the Constitutional rights and human rights of the people NOT to enforce fascism and communism on the people. The police have the power to refuse to impose fascist and communist laws which breach the Constitutional rights and Human Rights of the people.
  
  The threats to democracy, freedom and Constitutional and human rights do not always emerge from external enemies and external issues, they often emerge from internal enemies, domestic enemies of democracy and freedom, and persons obsessed with self enrichment and empowerment
  

• Covid19 and Fascist Laws and Communist Laws
  
  
  
  
  German internment camp for covid19 in 2021. Similarities to Nazi Germany in 1930's and 1940's. Click on picture to go to news site.
  
  
  
  Covid19 lockdown protestors being harassed in Ireland. Click on Picture below
  
  
  
  George Orwells' Warning
  
  
  
  The existing political policies and regulations of lockdown, house arrests, police checkpoints everywhere, jailings, censorship of the press and media and of the Internet, secret police monitoring of the people, new detention centres (concentration camps), anti Constitutional measures, police state, fascism are not justified, proportionate, legal, required. The destruction of businesses and economies is not ustified, proportionate, legal, required.
  The Police are there to serve the Constitution and the People and to protect the Constitutional rights and human rights of the people NOT to enforce fascism and communism on the people.
  How far will this Fascism and Communism and Destruction of democratic rights be allowed to go ? .
  

• Destroying Democratic rights and Human Rights and Imposing Tyranny and an Orwellian 1984 Society
  
  Madness in Melbourne   Abstract click on link for full article: https://www.activistpost.com/2020/08/madness-in-melbourne.html
  
  The following has been imposed in Australia. Police may now enter anyone’s home without a warrant.
  
  • Curfew 8:00pm.
    
  • $1,652 fine if outside without “a valid reason” – an amount being raised by the day.
    
  • Can’t visit any family or friends.
    
  • $200 fine for no mask (mandatory masks at all times).
    
  • Can only exercise once per day, for up to 1 hour.
    
  • Only one person per household, per day can leave the house (including for groceries).
    
  • Can’t go more than 3 miles from your home.
    
  • Weddings are illegal.
    
  • No gatherings of any size.
    
  • Army is on the streets fining/arresting people.
    
  • “Since March 21, a total of 193,740 spot checks have been conducted by police across Victoria.”
    
  • Protests/activism is illegal; people have already been arrested for peaceful gatherings.
    
  • Media is EXTREMELY biased, calls protesters “right wing conspiracy nutjobs” and won’t allow discussion of whether these lockdowns are right or not.
    
  • Several thousand people were placed under house arrest and unable to leave for ANY reason, with food rations delivered by the army, leading to appalling levels of personal trauma.
    
  • Australia won’t release how many fines they’ve given out, but an ABC news report says it’s over $5.2 million so far.
    
  • Streets of Melbourne are empty, even in a city of 5 million+ people. People are HATEFUL to each other, everyone is cannibalising their neighbours (calling police to report any little infraction of the rules and turning on each other like some socialist hellhole).
    
  • Billboards outside on the street that say in capital letters: “WHAT ARE YOU DOING? STAY HOME.” They feel extremely oppressive, like we’re being yelled at by a very oppressive government.
    
  • The Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews shows complete and utter disdain for us, constantly blaming us. He’s blamed children (yes, really) for not taking this seriously enough. Every chance he gets, he tells us it’s OUR fault the virus is spreading (even though that’s what viruses do – they spread).
    
  • It’s not just the Victorian Premier – the Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison is just as terrible. He’s encouraged all of this, and he was responsible for the first lockdown.
    
  • 1984 dystopian language: billboards everywhere saying “Staying apart keeps us together.” Have they gone mad?
    
  • There’s probably more but at this point I honestly lost track of all the insanity that’s happened.
    
  • All because 147 people died in the state of Victoria (total population is 6.359 million), almost all of the deaths are over 70 with comorbidities, same as everywhere else in the world.
    
  • This is lockdown ideology at work. It is tyranny without limit, at the expense of all human dignity, decency, and rights. The politicians make a desert and call it health.
    
  • Like everywhere else on the planet, Melbourne will have to reach herd immunity from C-19 at some point. Those who deny that are risking not only liberty and health but civilization itself.
    
  • Perhaps the other states in Australia will observe the destruction in Victoria and learn to take another path when the virus first arrives in their territory, as it surely will. Lockdowns are not science; they are brutality.
    
    
• Illegal and Criminal Activity
  Evidence has emerged of certain individuals and businesses holding patents for coronaviruses including the covid19 virus. This presents a legal problem. It is illegal to hold a patent on a natural product arising from nature. So if covid19 is natural and arises from nature then it is illegal to hold a patent for it. If covid19 did not arise from nature and was man made in labs, then it is possible to get a patent for it. However, this would mean that covid19 is a biological weapon as it has killed thousands of people worldwide. Development and use of Biological weapons has been illegal for many years, this would mean that those involved in creating covid19 acted illegally and are guilty of serious crime.
  Which is it ?
  
  
• Social Justice ?
  As a resuilt of covid19, the lockdowns and the decrease in economic growth and output, the United Nations has warned of a “famine of biblical proportions” with 265 million people “literally marching to the brink of starvation,”and later estimated that the crisis had “pushed an additional 150 million children into multidimensional poverty — deprived of education, health, housing, nutrition, sanitation or water.”
  Sources
  Fiona Harvey, Coronavirus pandemic ‘will cause famine of biblical proportions’, Guardian, Apr. 21, 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/apr/21/coronavirus-pandemic-will-cause-famine-of-biblical-proportions.
  UNICEF, COVID pushes millions more children deeper into poverty, new study finds, UN News, Sep. 17, 2020, https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/09/1072602.
  
  

Causes of Deaths from Covid19 which are of Concern to Lawyers and the Courts

There were deaths from covid19 and we need to examine the reasons for these deaths. The evidence and facts support the following:

1. Forced infected people from hospitals or their homes into nursing homes. No quarantine there. And did not bother to test new arrivals, existing residents and staff in nursing homes. And no PPE for these people in nursing homes and no de-contamination procedures in nursing homes.
2. Denied people oxygen treatment but put them on ventilators often at high pressure and this led to deaths
3. Denied patients hydroxychloroquine, azt, zinc, steroids and other treatments in nursing homes, hospitals, medical clinics which could have saved lives.
4. Passed Do Not Resucitate Orders (DNR) which led to deaths
5. Closed hospitals and doctors practises and cancelled screenings, diagnostic tests and treatments for cancers, heart diseases, neurological diseases, diabetes, endocrine illnesses, and other diseases, etc. This led to deaths and will lead to more deaths aftet the national lockdowns. Some of these deaths were caused by the primary illness which was not covid19 but were mis-labelled as covid19 deaths.
6. Failure or inability to distinguish between dying of another illness with covid19 and dying specifically of covid19. Primary cause of death was non covid19. Mislabelling of deaths as covid19. In the USA hospitals had a financial incentive from the government to do this.

Independent Panels of Experts inside Countries with No Conflicts of Interest. Full Accountability and Transparency. Panels which can challenge the WHO, NIH, CDC and other Bodies worldwide.

The incompetence and errors and failure of WHO have been well documented in 2020 and for many previous years. There is a need for fully independent Epidemiologists, medical doctors, hospital specialists or consultants, Immunologists, Microbiologists, scientific researchers, hospital managers, a health minister, representatives of police and military to form a Panel, all of whom have no conflicts of interest and no ties to special interests such as vaccine makers, patents, Big Pharma or WHO. This Independent Panel would
(i) be open to all members of the parliament and to the press and media, including the independent press and media and social media channels, to medical and scientific experts, and to some members of the public. Be broadcast live.
(ii) all participants publicly declare no conflicts of interest
(iii) closely examine the national scientific evidence and international evidence and facts, develop their own Criteria independent of special interests and international organizations
(iv) provide active measures to mitigate and counteract the pandemic and expose any undue influence of special interests / conflicts of interest.
(v) Activate emergency medical supplies and production nationally and internationally.
(vi) The scientific facts and evidence would be open to vigorous public scrutiny and debate. Criteria would be open to scrutiny and debate and amendments. There would be full accountability and transparency.
(vii) The press and media and Internet would not be censored.
The general public, including businesses, farmers, sporting organisations would be fully informed and have the right to question any aspect of these findings, criteria and measures. This panel of experts would challenge the WHO, the NIH, CDC and other bodies and dismiss their findings and advice in certain cases. T

Panels could include people such as: Professor Michael Levitt the Nobel prize winner, Professor Michael Levitt the Nobel prize winner, Dr. Luc Montagnier another Nobel prize winner, Dr. Rashid Buttar and hundreds of his medical doctor friends in the USA, Dr. John Oxford, Dr. Joel Hay, Dr. Pablo Goldschmidt, Dr. Erich Bendavid, Dr. Yanis Roussel, Dr. Beda Stadler, Dr. Yoram Lass, Dr. Didier Raoult, Dr. Dolores Cahill, Dr. Zach Bush, Dr. Marcus De Brun, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Dr. Karin Molling, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Yannis Roussel, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Knut Wittkowski, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Professor Johan Giesecke, Professor Alexander Kekulé, Dr. Clare Craig, Dr. Frank Ulrich Montgomery, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Dr. Martin Kulldorf, Dr. David Katz, Dr. Michael Osterhold, Dr. Peter Goetzsche, Professor Erich Bendavid, Dr. Pietro Vernanzza, Professor John Ionnadis, Dr. Gerhard Krause, Professor Maria Gita Gismondo, Dr. Karina Reiss, Dr. Karl Probst, Dr. Heiko Schonning, Dr Michael Yeadon, Dr. Martin Haditsch, Dr. Harold Lesch, Professor Stefan Hockerz, Professor Hendrik Streek, Dr. Carten Scheler, Dr. Carl Henaghan and researchers at the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine in Oxford, England.

Documentary Film about Covid19 by Top Scientific and Medical Experts

London Real broadcast an important documentary about covid19 on the 18th August 2020. Top scientific and medical experts gave their analysis of the covid19 virus and the national lockdowns, censorship, lies, frauds, and loss of democratic rights. The film is called 'Plandemic' and is hosted on the Digitial Freedom Platform.
https://freedomplatform.tv/plandemic-indoctornation-world-premiere

Italy, Spain and badly affected countries

• new scientific studies and medical reports from Italy and USA show that over 93% in USA and 97% in Italy  of those who died from covid-19 had a number of pre-existing illnesses and most of these were over 70 years old.
  
  
• Due to lack of medical testing kits in Italy, Spain and other countries they have not been able to test all persons who were infected with covid-19. This means the figures for those infected are inaccurate and far more than reported in the news. This also means the percentage of infected people dying from the infection cannot be determined. It could be 1% or less than 1%. Or it could be 1 in a 1,000 infected people or less dying (.001) as proposed by the new Oxford model.
  
  
• New research findings show that some flu vaccines given to the US military personnel and to residents in Italy increased their risk of serious infection from covid19, risk of serious complications and higher risk of death. Many of those people who received such vaccines would be middle aged or older, and have other illnesses. This is an important factor in the covid19 pandemic. See research paper below.
  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647
  This an extremely important finding which needs to be assessed by medical organizations and governments worldwide. Scientists such as Professor Dolores Cahill in Ireland and many others have alerted the public to this danger.
  
  
• Lombardy in Italy and other regions of Northern Italy have had high rates of deaths from respiratory illnesses for decades. Dr. Zach Bush and other leading doctors and scientists have found that the level of air pollution in an area is the best predictor of death from respiratory illnesses. How does the air pollution in Lombardy and Northern Italy relate to the high incidence of covid19 deaths there ? and Wuhan in China also has high levels of air pollution and high rates of respiratory and lung diseases.
  
  
• Of the patients who died in the EU and other badly affected countries what percentage had serious pre-existing illnesses and conditions ?
  
  
• Northern Italy had a high percentage of people over 66 years old ?
  
  
• what percentage of people who died from covid-19 would have died anyways from pre-existing illnesses and / or  old age in 2020 ? are all of these now being labeled covid19 deaths ?
  
  
• how do covid-19 deaths compare to deaths from heart attacks, cancers, respiratory illnesses, accidents, cerebrovascular diseases and alzheimers disease for 2020 ? are all of these now being labeled covid19 deaths ?
  
  
• how does the covid19 pandemic compare to seasonal deaths in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 throughout Europe and globally ?
  
  
• why has there been a big decrease in deaths from heart attacks, cancers, influenza, copd and other respiratory illnesses, accidents, cerebrovascular diseases and alzheimers disease in 2020 compared to 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 ?
  
  
• what percentage died from seasonal factors and an already overloaded healthcare system due to flu, colds, pneumonia, asthma, bronchitis, smoker’s lung, lung diseases, copd, food poisoning, cancers, heart problems which were seasonal prior to the pandemic ?  and what percentage were wrongly labelled as covid-19 deaths ?
  
  
• are deaths from covid-19 being reported as separate to non covid-19 deaths ? are some deaths being wrongly registered as covid-19 deaths ? can we get numbers for this ?
  
  
• New York, USA
  Evidence has emerged that
  • Nursing homes did not have mandatory covid19 tests, face masks and gloves for all staff and for residents at the start of and during the covid19 pandemic.
  • nursing homes throughout New York were ordered to accept elderly patients who had covid19 or had not been tested for covid19. There was no compulsory testing before admitting these patients into nursing homes. Many of these new admissions came from hospitals. This increased the infection rate among a highly vulnerable segment of the population. Governor Cuomo has received public criticism for this.
  • Overuse of ventilators in New York instead of oxygen treatments, hyperbaric treatment and effective medications (listed above) led to high death rates from this overuse. Importantly, the hypoxia and hypoxic injury to the body was ignored in nursing homes.
  • Many hospitals gave orders not to resuscitate people who had heart attacks and other life threatening illnesses. When this is combined with orders to presume all deaths are from covid19 (see false diagnosis section above) this adds further to the covid19 mortality figures.
  • Governor Cuomo also greatly restricted the supply of hydroxychloroquine to patients in New York in the middle of the covid19 pandemic, despite the fact that medical doctors and scientists had great success with hydroxychloroquine (see treatments section above). 
  • There has been disturbing evidence that this important medication and other medical treatments mentioned here were not used in nursing homes in Ireland, New York, some states in the USA and several western countries. This may have contributed to the higher death rates in these institutions.
  • the government and state bodies and Heath authority refused to help out nursing homes when they cried out for help during the covid19 pandemic. Cries for PPE, covid19 tests, replacement staff, quarantine units, decontamination work, effective medicines and other treatments for covid19, and medical equipment were ignored.
  • no regulation of private nursing homes, no enforcement of laws for nursing homes, no oversight body for nursing homes, no investigations, no strategic pandemic plans for nursing homes, no standard operating procedures for dealing with these type of emergenices. Too much government and state body incompetence and lack of action, and over-payment for this incompetence.
  • No strategic efforts were made by national governments and state governments to quarantine nursing homes, for all staff and residents to use masks and gloves and for regulation disinfection sessions of the whole building a few times a day.
  • Statistics in many countries show that 50% - 70% of all deaths were in nursing homes

These factors may explain the unusually high covid19 mortality rate in New York and many other places. And the high mortality rate in nursing homes in several countries. This skews the data and the national and international Critera.
People need to be made accountable for this.

• what percentage died from a depleted, broken down health system starved of funds, ICU facilities, equipment, and investment from the crash of 2008 and the accompanying bank and speculator bailouts and harsh austerity measures imposed by the EU and ECB ?  Will the EU government and ECB take responsibility for their destructive austerity which decimated healthcare systems and hospitals throughout the EU ?
  
  
• how do deaths from suicide relate to covid19 and its serious economic effects and social effects ?
  
  
  

Causes and Origins of the Covid-19 virus and Criminal Investigations

In medicine and science it is important to identify the causes and origins of epidemics and pandemics and learn lessons from it. This can help prevent future pandemics and epidemics and enable governments to take protective measures in future. Whole economies and indeed the global economy are dependent on this type of information.

• In Summer and Autumn 2020 Dr. Li-Meng Yan a Chinese scientist who studied the covid19 virus in Chinese labs made serious allegations that the covid19 was created in a lab and was man made and that the Chinese government is covering this up. She fleed China and went to the USA. News Reports regarding allegations made by Dr. Li-Meng Yan
  News Reports
  
  
• Evidence has emerged of certain individuals and businesses holding patents for coronaviruses including the covid19 virus. This presents a legal problem. It is illegal to hold a patent on a natural product arising from nature. So if covid19 is natural and arises from nature then it is illegal to hold a patent for it. If covid19 did not rise from nature and was man made in labs, then it is possible to get a patent for it. However, this would mean that covid19 is a biological weapon as it has killed thousands of people worldwide. Development and use of Biological weapons has been illegal for many years, this would mean that those involved in creating covid19 acted illegally and are guilty of serious crime.
  Which is it ?
  
  
• In 2018, The US State Department raised concerns over safety issues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a research lab studying coronaviruses in animals like bats, new diplomatic cables reveal. They warned that a lack of tight safety measures in handing the contagious viruses in the lab 'represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic.'  Despite these safety concerns,  the US National Institute of Health, a government agency, had given a $3.7million research grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China to carry out research on bats from caves in Yunnan, more than 1,000 miles away. Scientists have traced the sequencing of the COVID-19 genome to Yunnan, the Mail on Sunday revealed over the weekend.
  Sources: Daily Mail in UK  https://www.dailymail.co.uk
  
  
• Criminal Investigations in countries worldwide
  

Excerpt from document - “COVID-19 & Public Health Totalitarianism: Untoward Effects on Individuals, Institutions and Society” by Dr. Peter Breggin, a medical doctor and psychiatrist which was filed in a Federal court in Ohio, USA, on August 31, 2020,
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/en/legal/science/legal-report.pdf

We wrote our first blog/report related to COVID-19 on this subject and sent it to the media, and several contacts,340 and within 48 hours President Trump overrode Fauci and cancelled funding.341 Both the joint US/Chinese virus and the current pandemic viruses are variants of SARS-CoV. It is now indisputable that the novel coronavirus, similar to but not the same as the one created in the joint US/Chinese research project, was made in the Wuhan facility and accidentally released, followed by the cover up by China and WHO, and then China’s enabling of the virus to spread around the world by air traffic.

Why did Fauci fund the joint US/Chinese collaborative venture in making a new epidemic SARS-CoV virus and support the Wuhan Institute itself ? It is likely that Fauci was especially interested in the research because it was using the virulent virus as a test case to see if they could create a vaccine for a coronavirus, but the researchers failed. Fauci’s search for a vaccine can be seen as a contributing factor to the occurrence of COVID-19, because without our research support and our scientific information sharing with China—and our sharing the actual virus with Chinese researchers—the Wuhan Institute might never have developed the technology to create the SARS-Cov-2 that now afflicts the world. Fauci was also the person in the best position to make sure that China corrected its well-known security risks in its new highest level of security research facility at the Wuhan Institute. But instead of withholding support from the Wuhan Institute and its researchers until they met the prevailing standards of safety, he continued to fund them.

~In this way, he is additionally responsible for the leak of the virus that caused COVID-19. Fauci’s support of the US/Chinese collaboration was in part due to his globalist orientation to disregard national interests and to collaborate with all comers. Also, the study was an important aspect of his work with Bill Gates (see part IV G) and with the worldwide pharmaceutical industry in developing treatments and vaccines for pandemic viruses. Fauci has had the most influential scientist and political personality in requiring a shutdown. Because of his support for US/Chinese collaborations in building deadly viruses and his support for the Wuhan Institute, he may also be the individual most responsible for the situation American and the world are in with SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 and yet he seems to seeking increased influence and power for himself, Bill Gates, and the drug companies through the prolongation of the very disaster he helped to create.

On April 15, 2020, we published an analysis, “2015 Scientific Paper Proves US & Chinese Scientists Collaborated to Create Coronavirus that Can Infect Humans,”that criticized the research as extremely risky in respect the virus accidentally or purposely being allowed to escape and in giving the virus and the technology to the Chinese Communist Party; and on April 16, I followed up with a video that now has over 50,000 viewers.342 Over those two days, Ginger Breggin and I began sending the blog report and video to every scientific, media, and political contact available to us. At a news conference the next day, April 17, 2020, according to Politico,343 a reporter asked President Trump about the funding of the project.

The President, who seemed to have been already briefed, stated, “We will end that grant very quickly. It was granted quite a while ago.” Politico further reported that the project had become a political liability for NIH by the time the administration wrote the institute on April 20, 2020 demanding “a list of all Chinese participants.” It was shortly after this that Politico announced, “Trump cuts U.S. research on bat-human virus transmission over China ties.” Neither Politico nor any major media that we could locate, such as ABC News,344supported the President’s decision to stop developing and sharing lethal technology with the Wuhan Institute and the government of China.

The American researchers justified their efforts as leading to better methods of fighting epidemic viruses. This public health motive might have been the purpose for the naïve US researchers, but Wuhan Institute researchers are part of China’s military establishment.345It is probable that Fauci’s drive to finally make a coronavirus vaccine—which once again failed in the 2015 study—knew no limits, such as commonsense, ethics, the law, or the protection of America and the world from the accidental or purposeful release of a deadly lab-made coronavirus.

A new book has reportedly confirmed that the Chinese military has command of the Wuhan Institute. The book also “explains the origins of the virus with precision and scientific resolve, starting from the Chinese attempt to study vaccines against SARS, inserting genomes from HIV into organisms (which makes them more aggressive), adding elements of coronavirus discovered in horseshoe bats, using a method called reverse genetics system 2.”346 This confirms what virus and vaccine scientists have shared with me and what I concluded after reading early scientific reports.347
( Book - Cervellera, B., 2020, Prof Tritto: COVID-19 was created in the Wuhan laboratory and is now in the hands of the Chinese military. AsiaNews.iT. http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Prof-Tritto:-COVID-19-was-created-in-the-Wuhan-laboratory-and-is-now-in-the-hands-of-the-Chinese-military-50719.html )

• The Fauci / COVID-19 Dossier
  by Dr. David E. Martin. This is a legal document designed for use in the courts and by governments, military and police personnel.
  
  
• More Scientific Evidence
  This is corroborated by the famous medical doctor and scientific researcher Dr. Rashid Buttar who has many years of experience in hospitals in the USA and in military hospitals has carefully studied the published scientific papers and articles in science journals relating  to coronavirus research for over 40 years. He has found some amazing evidence to suggest that the covid-19 virus differs widely from other coronaviruses, and has acquired unusual and unexplained “gain of function” which appears to be man made. He cites documents and research showing that Fauci and NIH funded research into manipulating coronaviruses to give them “gain of function”, in China and the USA, against the wishes of the US government and Regulators and many scientific researchers at the time. Gain of function means genetic manipulation and other biological manipulation of viruses to make viruses more lethal and / or more contagious. The NIH in the USA gave $3.7 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab in China for this coronavirus research. He provides scientific evidence to suggest that this work may be linked to military research. The fact that many thousands of people have died and millions are infected worldwide is a cause for concern. This may lead to criminal investigations in future. In late April 2020 President Donald Trump publicly stated that a government investigation into this is  ongoing. This is presented in scientific research videos he put up online -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15YKs_dyEZI or  https://www.askdrbuttar.com/Ask/ or https://londonreal.tv/digital-freedom-platform-interview-1-dr-rashid-buttar/
  
  Nature Magazine published papers in March and April 2020 showing that covid19 had 12 nucleotides which were very different to other coronaviruses. This is highly unusual and appears to be an unexplained gain of function for the virus. This gain of function has occurred very quickly, as these type of mutations typically take many decades and centuries to achieve in nature. This will require further investigations. This evidence was recently discussed online by Dr. Dolores Cahill a scientist and Immunologist based in Ireland. I attach references below
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Avc6_ftzk3w
  
  Interview of top scientist by Dr. Ivor Cummins
  
  
  Important scientific paper showing similarities between humans and lab mice in their infection pathways and reaction to covid19.
  Molecular mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and mammalian proteomes: implications for the vaccine
  Darja Kandu and Yehuda Shoenfeld. Immunol Res. 2020 Sep 18 : 1–4. doi: 10.1007/s12026-020-09152-6
  
  
• Genetic sequencing of covid19 virus traces it back to bats in Yunnan caves in China which were used and studied in laboratories in Wuhan, such as Wuhan Institute of Virology and Wuhan CDC. In Autumn and Winter 2020, Chinese scientists at this lab became very ill with covid19 and died.
  
  'A lab leak isn't 100% certain but it seems to be the only logical source of Covid': Washington expert who led inquiry into the cause of the virus reveals three Wuhan lab scientists fell ill in November 2019
  Daily Mail, 27 March, 2021
  
  The map below shows infection levels in Wuhan
  
  
  
  
• In April 2020, several newspapers around the world reported that the NIH and Fauci in the USA had given $3.7 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab in China for research into coronaviruses a few years prior to the 2020 pandemic. This lab is at the centre of the covid19 pandemic controversy and allegations of poor safety standards.
  
  
• Where did the virus come from? One of the world’s leading experts in bioweapons is Dr. Francis Boyle. He is convinced it originated from a bioweapon lab in Wuhan, the Bio Safety Lab Level 4. This facility is specialized in the development of… coronaviruses!
  
  
• Are there secret labs in China which have been experimenting with viruses and vaccines for many years which the Chinese Communist leaders were unaware of ?
  
  
• The Bill Gates Foundation supports vaccinations including mandatory vaccinations for covid19 globally and has also publicly supported stronger global population control or depopulation. This appears like a contradiction or perhaps it is not.
  
  
• Lockstep and Top down control by Globalist institutions
  the 'Lockstep' programme first proposed by the Rockefeller foundation in 2010. This proposes a harsh top down approach to dealing with several types of crisis, such as imposing national lockdowns, censorship of the press and media, the promotion of mass fear and paranoia, jailings and abuse of rights, mandatory masks, tight control of doctors and scientists through their governing bodies and regulators, and coordinated government policies in countries around the world. This was enforced during the covid19 'pandemic' in 2020. This 'Lockstep' programme was further developed by Event 201 hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, WHO, and Bill Gates Foundation in Autumn 2019, a few months before the covid19 pandemic began. This Event 201 simulated a viral pandemic, involving a coronavirus, very similar to covid19 and it proposed WHO domination of medical and scientific information and tight control of governments across the world, censorship of the press and media and the Internet, the use of propaganda to promote mass fear, paranoia and obedience, censorship and tight control of doctors and medical organisations, National Lockdowns and the closure of businesses, the closing down of economies, local or regional lockdowns and restrictions on freedom, mandatory masks, and many abuses of Constitutional rights and human rights, and the marketing vaccines as the only solution during this simulated global pandemic. This simulation was very similar to what happened months later during the covid19 pandemic. This Lockstep and other measures proposed in Event 201 were enforced in the covid19 episode in 2020. This is the Globalist agenda of control over nations. This is the same as communism and nazism and has led to an erosion of many democratic rights. This level of control is the aim of Globalists.
  The covid19 virus had a fatality rate of less than 0.3% and over 90% of deaths was in the over 70's with pre-existing illnesses according to international scientific research and the data. It was equivalent to a bad flu season. Economies and nations were destroyed for this.
  
  
• Event 201
  In October 2019, an event took place in the USA called ‘Event 201’. This simulated a global pandemic caused by a coronavirus. Even 201 took place a few months before the covid19 pandemic began. This involved a partnership between Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and  the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates played a major role in this. This simulation involved WHO leadership and direction in the crisis and accompanying obedience from governments worldwide, and coordination between governments, national lockdowns, the closing of businesses, mass unemployment, the suspension of Constitutional rights and human rights in countries worldwide, police state or fascism, social distancing, vast economic losses to countries, hysteria in the press and media, the censorship of the press and media and of social media to ensure that they stick to the hysteria and panic in the mainstream media and the WHO narrative, continuing the lockdown until vaccines are developed, and the eventual development of vaccines and the use of such. It was eerily similar to the covid19 pandemic which broke out in 2020. The same leaders in the Event 201 simulation played major leadership roles in the pandemic of 2020. They said the same things, employed the same tactics, the same strategies, etc.  Event 201 has been seen by many commentators and scientists as eerily similar to the pandemic of 2020.
  
  Interestingly Event 201 did not recommend tighter and stricter oversight of the biological manipulation of viruses in labs, ending the development of bio-weapons, creating greater containment facilities and strategies for lab viruses and leaks out of labs, the enforcement of ethics and morality in virus and bacteria research, the ending of NIH grants and other government grants for bio-weapons in USA and abroad, an end to open borders and the importation of viruses into countries, and full global transparency in virus research worldwide, and the prevention of profiteering from global pandemics and ending the over-extension of centralized government control in the aftermath of pandemics. Some of the best solutions to pandemics involve preventing them from taking place and removing the profitable incentives for pandemics.
  
  
• In September 2019 – right before the covid19 outbreak – the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board of the WHO released a report titled ‘A World At Risk’. It stressed the need to be prepared for… a coronavirus outbreak! On the cover of the report is the picture of a coronavirus and people wearing face masks.
  
  
  
  
  
• In 2018 The Institute for Disease Modeling made a video in which they show a flu virus originating in China, from the area of Wuhan, and spreading all over the world, killing millions. They called it ‘A Simulation For A Global Flu Pandemic.’ That is exactly what happened, two years later. Why did they say it would come from China? Why not Africa, where far more diseases are present? Or why not South America? Or India?
  
  
• The author and investigator Robin de Ruiter wrote a book called Corona Crisis in 2008 and predicted in 2008 that there would be a coronavirus pandemic and global lockdown. He said the purpose of this would be to create a new world of authoritarian control.
  
  
  
  
• Bill Gates made some highly controversial statements in the years prior to the covid19 pandemic.
  
  ‘A global pandemic is ON IT’S WAY. An ENGINEERED VIRUS is humanities greatest threat. This will happen in the NEXT DECADE.’ – BILL GATES, in 2018
  
  “I’m particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health: vaccines.” – Bill Gates, Dec. 19, 2019
  
  These public statements are quite sinister.
  
  Dr. Rashid Buttar, the aforementioned hospital doctor, and other doctors and scientists have publicly called for US government investigations of the
  (i) WHO’s links to Bill Gates and his links to the following:
  (ii) Anthony Fauci and
  (iii) the Pirbright Institute in Britain which patented the coronavirus and
  (iv) Event 201 simulation and
  (v) vaccine makers and Big Pharma and their relationship to the press and media and big social media companies and their advertising revenues, and
  (vi) how some of these above parties are linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab and Wuhan CDC lab and other labs in China.
  The old dictum of ‘follow the money’ is always useful. The US government and several other governments are investigating this.
  
  
• Serious Allegations
  there have been serious allegations made that test kits for covid19 were traded worldwide in 2017 and 2018, two years before the pandemic of 2020, and appeared on the online database of the World Integrated Trade Solution, run by the World Bank - screenshot of web site
  This is the subject of ongoing investigations
  

• The Role of Globalisation in the Covid 19 Pandemic

• the evidence and the facts clearly show that Open Borders policies worsen viral pandemics and this was certainly the case in 2020 with the covid19 pandemic. What is the EU and national governments’ position on ‘open borders’ in the middle of a global pandemic and threats of new and emerging pandemics in the future ?
  
  
• flights into Ireland (and many other countries) were not shut down after the Irish government lockdown in early March 2020. There are records of flights from high risk countries coming in for February and March, up to April 2020. And no testing, quarantine and tracing at Dublin airport and other airports in Ireland. There are also people coming into the country from high risk areas via boats and trucks ? And no testing at the ports? Why did this happen? Why are we importing more covid-19 cases into Ireland ? why are other countries importing covid-19 into their countries via their airports and shipping ports.
  
  
• why is there no lockdown and testing and quarantine at airports and shipping ports in the worst global pandemic in a century ? while ordinary people living inside a country are subject to severe lockdown ?
  
  
• Globalization greatly spreads out the damage of accidents in laboratories, nuclear power stations, chemical factories, and high pollution industries
  
  
• what is the EU and national governments’ position and response to  global supply chains which can break down due to illnesses or crisis in a production country ?
  
  
• why are there no strategic industries, strategic automated production reserves, strategic reserve capacity, and strategic supplies to cover global pandemics, wars, famines, droughts, financial  crashes, etc. ? why is there no resilience built into the global system or Globalisation ?
  
  
• What medical drugs, medical supplies, medical tests, antibodies, etc. can be mass produced via automated production (24/7) and 3D print production within the country and within individual countries for use in those countries ? how can we reduce dependency and long time lags ? how can we build national capacity, instead of more globalization based on third world wages ?
  Has too many billions and trillions of euros and dollars been wasted every year on speculation in asset prices and derivatives ?
  
  
• why has the neo liberal form of Globalization failed in this area ?
  
  
• is this the same Globalisation which deprived many western governments of trillions of euros in tax revenues over the last 25 years, through tax evasion, tax havens, and relocation of production to the third world ? Money which could have built more hospitals, bought more ICU’s and medical supplies, hired more healthcare staff, invested more in medical and scientific research etc.

There have been severe disruptions to the global supply chain of medical supplies and medical equipment due to over reliance on China and third world countries for production. This is also vulnerable to political fighting and tensions. Under Globlaisation we have depleted hospitals and healthcare and tax revenues, and subcontracted production to China and similar countries when we should have concentrated it in EU countries (and in North America). There is too much efficiency but no resilience built into Globalisation which leaves it vulnerable to breakdown in a crisis.

• Some people such as Bill Gates and his disciples in the WHO, NIH and in the press and media, are calling for mandatory vaccines for covid19 and a microchip implant to verify that a person has been vaccinated. This is madness, and Bill Gates sounds like a tin foil hat conspiracy theory person. These daft proposals would be an abuse of one’s human rights which are protected by UN and EU human rights laws, one’s bodily integrity, and one’s Constitutional rights, one’s civil rights which are protected by law and an abuse of one’s democratic rights.
  
  
• Social Justice ?
  As a resuilt of covid19, the lockdowns and the decrease in economic growth and output, the United Nations has warned of a “famine of biblical proportions” with 265 million people “literally marching to the brink of starvation,”and later estimated that the crisis had “pushed an additional 150 million children into multidimensional poverty — deprived of education, health, housing, nutrition, sanitation or water.”
  Sources
  Fiona Harvey, Coronavirus pandemic ‘will cause famine of biblical proportions’, Guardian, Apr. 21, 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/apr/21/coronavirus-pandemic-will-cause-famine-of-biblical-proportions.
  UNICEF, COVID pushes millions more children deeper into poverty, new study finds, UN News, Sep. 17, 2020, https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/09/1072602.
  
  
• The following video raises important questions about the covid19 pandemic.

  

  
  

What is the Game Plan and the Endgame

Many scientists, doctors, researchers, professors, academics, journalists, broadcasters, professionals believe the Game Plan is to create mass fear, paranoia, and panic through the press and media, enforce lockdowns, travel restrictions and other social restrictions, bankrupt economies around the world and create mass desperation for vaccines and massive profits for big pharma, and a 'Great Re-set' which would facilitate communist or fascist control of societies. A mass market of 7 billion people requiring multiple doses of new vaccines every year, a market worth trillions of dollars in profits. And societies which are tightly controlled for selling these products and controlling the people. Should we "follow the money" ? Could this be true or not ?

The Role of Religion and Spirituality

At times of great global crisis such as the covid19 issue many people turn to religion and spirituality for answers and comfort. Fortunately we and many other (non communist) countries have freedom of religion, and this has empowered people to look much deeper for answers.

• Several catholic cardinals and bishops and catholic doctors, scientists, journalists and professionals have issued a public statement to governments, all catholics, all christians and all peoples. This statement strongly condemns the national lockdowns and loss of Consitutional rights, human rights and the right to religious freedom in many countries.It is named
  APPEALFOR THE CHURCH AND THE WORLD to Catholics and all people of good will
  
  
• Archbishop Vigano issued an important public letter to President Donald Trump on October 31 2020. In it he condemned the lockdowns, the Great Reset, the mandatory vaccines and the imposition of communism / fascism on most nations.
  https://bardsofwarfilm.com/open-letter/
  Archbishop Vigano Letter to President Trump
  
  
• Press and media reports concerning covid19 and Catholic Bishops and Prelates
  
  
• Catholic Priest in Ireland faces arrest, prosecution and jail for saying mass. We have gone back to the days of Cromwell and the Penal laws of the 1700's.
  Are we going to live in a communist state or what?’ - Priest refusing to close Church suggests faith will stop virus spreading
  Irish Independent newspaper, November 20, 2020
  
  
• A great sermon by an Irish priest based in Monaghan, Ireland on October 25, 2020
  
  
  
  
• A sermon by a well known catholic priest in the USA in September 2020 condemned the lockdowns, the covid19 hysteria and paranoia, the denial of human rights and religious freedoms, and the oppression of catholics and christians
  
  
  
  
  
• Sermons by catholic priests and other christian leaders about the lockdowns, the covid19 hysteria and paranoia, the denial of human rights and religious freedoms, and the oppression of catholics and christians
  
  
  • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKU9plS4xIjCcFaNlfQjL7w
    
    
    
• How do priests, pastors, preachers, church elders, bishops, cardinals feel Game Plan and the Endgame mentioned above ?
  
  
• How does the social isolation, social distancing, social exclusion really feel ? does it cause religious people and spiritual people to desire more social connection, more social inclusion, more social cohesion, more coming together of people in the aftermath of this pandemic ?
  
  
• Does it cause people to have empathy for ill and sick people and for those who have been socially excluded for many years and decades ?
  
  
• Will it end the social exclusion of, and mocking, sneering at the ill and sick ? and the slandering and malicious gossip about the ill and the sick ? will it end the stigma and discrimination against ill people ? will it end the war against the ill and sick in society ?
  
  
• Does it show how interconnected we all are as humans ?
  
  
• Will it cause religious leaders and spiritual leaders to stand up for truth ? and to expose the corruption, lies and cover ups by those people in power?
  
  
• Does Matthew 23 from the Bible apply to priests, bishops, cardinals, popes, pastors, reverends, elders, etc. during the covid19 episode.
  
  
• Do religious leaders and spiritual leaders and their many followers need to change the way they preach, and treat others and live their lives? should they take more responsibility and become doers?
  

 

Idiots and Lunatics during the covid19 Lockdowns

The lockdowns in 2020 and 2021 must have had an adverse effect on the mental health and well being of some scientists and television producers. The following video of a television show on RTE shows people behaving like idiots and lunatics on live television.

Picture of televised event

The standard of television broadcasting needs to improve. The Irish people and nation deserve better.

The Failure of Economics

• Ireland had a national debt of 215 billion euros prior to March 2020 when the covid19 pandemic started. The destruction of the Irish economy through lockdowns has led to many billions of euros of lost revenues for businesses and tax revenues for government. In January 2021 it was announced that the Government Budget deficit was 19 billion euros. This adds another 19 billion euros to the national debt. This worsens the bankruptcy of the Irish nation.
  Government expects year-end budget deficit of 19bn for 2020. Irish Times, January 5th 2021
  
  
• The first thing the newly formed Irish government did in July 2020 was give ministers a pay rise of 17%. This occurred while business people and professionals lost millions of euros in sales, profits and salaries due to the covid19 national lockdowns imposed by the Irish government. Many businesses and professionals have become bankrupt. Does this deserve a 17% pay increase for government ministers ?
  
  
• The covid19 pandemic is projected to cause the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930’s according to the IMF, World Bank, OECD, and top economists worldwide.
  Is this economic crisis caused by national lockdowns imposed by governments really necessary ?
  

• Ireland is being pushed further into national bankruptcy through new EU covid19 debt policies
  Ireland is being forced to pay 16 billion euros to bail out the European Union during the covid19 crisis. This amounts to 3,200 euros for every person in Ireland. This will further bankrupt the Irish nation and lead to more deficits and more taxes and cutbacks in Ireland. This is an outrageous injustice against the Irish people and nation.
  London Times article - Ireland to put nearly ?19bn into EU Covid-recovery fund
  The following news video explains this situation:
  
  
  
  
• Should Ireland and many other countries be plunged into more national debt, more austerity policies, more taxes, more recession / depression to pay for this international scandal ?
  https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/eu-aid-of-500bn-are-loans-and-must-be-paid-back-says-taoiseach-1.4246503
  
  
• We have a defective and dysfunctional economic system which is subject to regular crashes due to the fact that many trillions of euros / dollars are wasted every year on Globalisation and slave labour and the maximisation of short term profits from speculation in asset prices and derivatives and massive bail outs which worsen Debt Slavery. And massive tax evasion through Globalisation. These are the main drivers behind depleted, under-resourced and inadequate hospitals, healthcare systems and nursing homes, the Debt Slavery which includes over indebted governments, businesses and consumers, the high levels of unemployment and under-employment, the economic austerity and stagnation, the poor growth or no growth, the desperate need to keep printing money (out of nothing), etc. etc.
  
  
• Quantitative Easing for Big Banks and Big Corporates led to trillions of euros being pumped into share buybacks and speculation in assets and derivatives globally between 2012 and 2019 to enrich CEO’s and top executives and now these businesses are left with massive debt in the midst of a global pandemic and accompanying recession / depression. Many are bankrupt or verging on it. What political and economic remedies are available? Do politicians and governments wish to continue with this system of Quantitative Easing to promote more share buybacks, price rigging, speculation and other market manipulations and more debt which have bankrupted important businesses ?
  
  

• Do governments wish to trap themselves and their peoples in the ‘Cantillon effect’ where those big corporate and globalist businesses, hedge funds and speculators closely linked to the money creation processes in big banks benefit from all new money and make enormous profits from speculation in asset prices while everybody else is deprived of money, jobs, careers, homes, investment in their community? And everybody else is forced to bail out these speculators, developers and banks when they crash.
  This Cantillon effect is not taught in schools and Universities, and the general public (including politicians)  are mostly ignorant of it.
  
  
• We are bound down by same failed economics which promoted the bank and speculator bailouts in 2008 which enforced austerity on many nations and severely depleted healthcare systems and hospitals. The socialism for the rich and ruthless capitalism for the working class and poor. Will governments accept higher and higher debt levels and national bankruptcy to satisfy the covid19 panic and hysteria merchants ?
  https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/eu-aid-of-500bn-are-loans-and-must-be-paid-back-says-taoiseach-1.4246503
  
  
• Have economists and government advisors and economics courses recognized the severe defects in Globalisation outlined in this paper ? and the severe defects and failures of Neo Liberal Economics ? and the defects in their debt based solutions such as ‘corona bonds, and piling more debt upon debt on countries and taxpayers ?
  
  

EU Government Lack of Response. The Lack of Response from other Governments worldwide. The need for a New Deal and new type of Marshall Plan NOT based on Debt and Debt Slavery

• The US Federal government is injecting $6 trillion into the American economy via Fiscal policies to save lives, the healthcare system, jobs, banks, businesses and the economy. And the Federal Reserve has promised unlimited Quantitative easing as it is  pumping trillions of dollars into the banks and private businesses to save them. How much has the EU government injected into the EU economy and into EU nations to save lives, the healthcare system, jobs, businesses and the European economy ?
  
  
• The Federal Reserve has printed over $3 trillion in new money to save poor quality ETF's and junk bonds. It is bailing out Wall street including bad investments. This is another bail out of the rich, even bigger than the one in 2008. This is unprecedented in US history. Another example of the bizarre Cantillon Effect in economics.
  This type of money printing has the effect of increasing the price of asset prices, including house prices, while impoverishing the working classes through higher prices and a fall in money value or purchasing power. It is worse than taxes.
  
  
• Ireland is being pushed further into national bankruptcy through new EU covid19 debt policies
  Ireland is being forced to pay 16 billion euros to bail out the European Union during the covid19 crisis. This amounts to 3,200 euros for every person in Ireland. This will further bankrupt the Irish nation and lead to more deficits and more taxes and cutbacks in Ireland. This is an outrageous injustice against the Irish people and nation. The following news video explains this situation:
  
  
  
  

• The ECB's money printing (out of nothing) and the lending of this to governments has added more debt to already highly indebted countries, pushing them further into bankruptcy and austerity. In response to the covid -19 crisis, does the EU government wish to pile more debt on top of national governments and taxpayers and worsen their debt to gdp (or gni) ratios pushing them further into bankruptcy, austerity and more deficits, as it did after the 2008 crash ? So called ‘corona bonds’ being the latest edition of this nonsense.
  
  
• The Germans who dominate the EU want to impose higher and higher debt levels on all EU nations and more austerity on European peoples. These are the same economic policies which led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and nazis in the late 1920's and 1930's.
  
  
• A New Deal or Marshall Plan type rescue - a Non Debt Solution
  As already stated, we have a defective and dysfunctional economic system which is subject to regular crashes due to the fact that many trillions of euros / dollars are wasted every year on Globalisation and slave labour and the maximisation of short term profits through speculation in asset prices and derivatives and massive bail outs which worsen Debt Slavery. And massive tax evasion through Globalisation. These are the main drivers behind depleted, under-resourced and inadequate hospitals, healthcare systems and nursing homes, the Debt Slavery which includes over indebted governments, businesses and consumers, the high levels of unemployment and under-employment, the economic austerity and stagnation, the poor growth or no growth, the desperate need to keep printing money (out of nothing), etc. etc.
  
  We need a New Deal or Marshall Plan rescue for Europe, USA, Canada, South America and other countries. Will the EU and ECB implement a Massive Quantitative Easing for the People & Non Debt program which includes:
  
  
  • bail out and sustain Small and Medium sized Businesses and implement debt write downs and write offs for small and medium sized businesses and for ordinary working people ? and
  • protection of worker’s incomes and the freezing of mortgage and rent payments and bank charges for the duration of the lockdown and a few months after ? and
  • the removal of the bank bailout debt of 2008 off the backs of taxpayers ? and use this to reduce taxes on busineses and workers and new investment in production, construction, research and jobs ?
  • use it postphone taxes, vat or sales taxes, commercial rents, debt payments, insurance for businesses for several months or 1 year for the purpose of improving the cashflow and liquidity of businesses and retaining employees
  • pump new debt free money and grants into existing businesses, new start ups, and link it to jobs and investment in new capacity and innovation
  • park any new debt to bail out the economy during the covid19 pandemic to the year 2070 or afterwards, which means this debt will begin to be paid down after that date.
  • New credit. Once businesses are stabilised and have much lower debt levels from the above measures they would be able to borrow new money and use this to expand capacity. Workers who are consumers would also have lower debt levels and would borrow new money to fund spending and investment. This expansion in credit would bring about a strong economic recovery. Many economic studies confirm this relationship.
  • invest it in new schemes to implement long term employee share ownership in all types of businesses and more farmer owned Coops and big farmer owned processing and production facilities to disperse the wealth of countries, provide a boost to production and demand over the short to long term, and protect Capitalism and Democracy
  • inject new monies into the restoration of hospitals and healthcare systems in all EU countries ? more hospital staff, more wards, more ICU's, hyperbaric and oxygen treatments, etc. and reverse the effects of austerity policies on hospitals and healthcare since 2008.
  • investment in oversight bodies, staff, procedures and equipment to ensure safety in nursing homes, residential facilites and hospitals
  • more funding for scientific and medical research to finally stop these type of pandemics
  • more funding for anti viral drug development
  • more funding for international cooperation in scientific research, including advanced global networking of computer networks, labs, Universities, government health funding bodies, and science networks, globally networked A.I. and databases for scientific analysis and sequencing and identifying and mapping all types of scientific signatures, new international cooperation in testing and trials to improve speed and effectiveness, develop synthetic antibodies, universal antibodies, reconfigure Interferon gamma, learning how nature defeats viruses, bacteria and parasites and using this knowledge to develop new drugs, etc.etc.
  • new industrial infrastructure to create new strategic industries inside countries, strategic automated production capacity (24/7 fully automated production capable of rapidly producing millions of units per week), strategic reserve capacity, strategic banking, credit and money creation inside countries, and strategic medical supplies in countries to cover global pandemics, epidemics, industrial accidents, wars, famines, droughts, tsunamis and flooding of coasts in countries, financial crashes, etc. Reduce dependency on other countries many thousands of miles away which may not cooperate in global emergenices.
    
  • A number of good economics books have been published recently which propose a New Deal or Marshall Plan type rescue to help nations deal with these type of emergencies and recover their economies worldwide. I would advise people to buy and read them.

• Will the EU use this Quantitative Easing to protect vital strategic industries such as agriculture, price guarantees for farmers, food supply chains, medicines and hospitals and medical supply chains ? and building new strategic productive reserve capacity and reserve supplies in EU countries ? the answer is no.
  
  

• Can governments and EU re-engineer the Cantillon effect to benefit all people instead of speculators and bankers ?
  
  

• Large Corporations and 1% which benefitted from the national lockdowns and economic disaster
  Some large multinational corporations such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Youtube, Netflix, junk bond sellers, bailed out speculators, banks and busineses which benefitted from the Cantillion effect, etc. made billions of euros during the covid19 pandemic and national lockdowns. Most other businesses face bankruptcy, severe cutbacks, take overs, employee lay-offs, etc. More needs to be done to protect these businesses and employees.
  
  

• Will the EU help fund safer production facilities for food, and protect the food supply chains within Europe ?
  
  

• Will the EU and national governments fund the tillage of more and more lands, including marginal lands throughout the EU to greatly increase production of vegetables and potatoes through new grants to farmers ?
  
  

• Will it implement such a New Deal or Marshall Plan type rescue ?
  The above measures are vast and far reaching and would protect many businesses and enable them to recover and to grow, and they protect the free market system. They would also protect democracy and freedom.
  

  We already know that the EU government has done nothing to help Spain and Italy in this covid-19 crisis. The ECB's money printing (out of nothing) and lending to governments has added more debt to already highly indebted countries. And we already know that the EU government and ECB enforced bank and speculator bailouts and harsh austerity measures on European nations after the crash in 2008 which destroyed the healthcare systems and economies of these nations. Yes, national governments in the EU could  NOT invest in healthcare and hospitals because the massive EU enforced debt had created higher deficits, and higher national debt burdens and interest burdens on nations. And these austerity measures have borne evil and nasty fruit in the depleted, under staffed, under resourced, under invested healthcare systems around Europe during the global pandemic of 2020.
  What is the EU government doing to remedy this and to reverse this Europe-wide depletion of healthcare and hospitals over the years ? nothing. Even Russia has helped out Italy and other European nations while Brussels did nothing.
  
  So called European ‘corona bonds’ would worsen this by increasing the debt to gdp (or gni) ratios in EU countries and pushing them further into bankruptcy, more deficits and more austerity in the future. The same austerity which depleted and destroyed healthcare systems and hospitals throughout Europe prior to the global pandemic. The Irish Government Budget of October 2020 is the same as the corona bonds proposal - the Irish government is borrowing over 20 billion euros from foreign bondholders, hedge funds and banks and this will be added to the national debt of Ireland in addition to the 16 billion euros to bail out the EU during the covid19 crisis. This will mean a debt of 50,000 euros for every person in Ireland. This is an economic and financial disaster for Ireland !
  
  This is the opposite of a New Deal. It is a debt and bankruptcy deal for Ireland. The EU government and ECB is pushing for this in all EU nations The EU and ECB is a failure,  a pit of incompetence, corruption, paralysis, waste, grandiosity, debt slavery for people and nations, and socialism for the rich and austerity for the masses.
  

This covid19 and budget crisis is forcing the Irish government and many other governments to invest less and less money in hospitals, healthcare, higher efficiencies and productivity in the healthcare sector, healthy living programmes for all, and more investment in science, research and education and in building up vast supplies of PPE and automated production facilties for producing these here in Ireland. They are refusing to implement a totally new economic system based on debt free money which would provide the means for these investments in the state sector and other investments in the private sector to provide for a more secure future and for sustainable long term economic growth.

Newer and More Innovative 'New Deal' Economic Solutions

1.  Restoration of National Money Creation and National Currencies
National currencies need to be restored worldwide. Federalist currencies and globalist currencies have failed worldwide. And we need to end speculation in currencies. A national currency should be based on the real economy of the nation such as its infrastructure, its productive assets, its production of physical goods, it's exports and imports, and it's productivity. We propose such a national currency below. The Irish model here could be used by other countries around the world.
The new money or national currency called 'Airgead' (money in Gaelic) must have the following characteristics:

The newly created money, Airgead, must be debt free and interest free. The money would be created by the Irish Central Bank or the Irish Treasury. This would prevent the build up of more and more massive national debt.  At present, we have the following failed and disastrous syste

-  money creation out of nothing by Central Banks which is lent to government at an interest rate. This debt is paid off by taxes and cutbacks to public services and investment. And it leads to too much debt and excessive taxation and depleted, under funded, and inadequate public services.
-  money creation out of nothing by commercial banks and the lending of this to governments, and also to businesses and individuals. This is the “Bond Markets”. And interest is charged on this. These bond prices and interest rates can vary according to speculation on the financial markets. This debt is paid off by taxes and cutbacks to vital public services and investment. And it leads to too much debt and excessive taxation, and depleted, under funded, and inadequate public services.
- large scale bail outs of failed banks and financial institutions by governments after the 2008 crash. This is being paid off via new loans from commercial banks and central banks which create the money out of nothing and by new taxes and levies and increases in existing taxes and cutbacks to vital public services. And it leads to too much debt and excessive taxation and depleted, under funded, and inadeqate public services.
-  Quantitative Easing means central banks buying up the assets of banks and financial institutions or giving loans of newly created money to banks and financial institutions. It is a government bail out of the banks and the rich. And it leads to too much debt and useless assets on the state's balance sheet and excessive taxation and depleted, under funded, and inadequate public services.
The money creation measures above have led to excessive debt, unsustainable debt, and very debt to gnp / gni ratios worldwide. It has also led to inadequate, under funded and failing public services and a rundown, neglected, outdated public infrastructure in many countries. And to austerity, high taxes and levies, high costs of living, and low economic growth. This is large scale robbery and theft from ordinary working people, from businesses, from farmers, and from the general public. It has been an economic and social disaster.

At present most newly created money by central banks (Quantitative Easing) and by commercial banks is first lent to big speculators (hedge funds, vulture funds, private equity, corporate speculators, wealthy individual speculators, property speculators) and to governments and later to individuals / families for the purpose of property price speculation.  This is known as the ‘Cantillon effect’ in economics. Most newly created is funnelled into price speculation in assets and derivatives, and not into production, productive assets, public works, hospitals, schools, roads and infrastructure. This airgead will need to be used for completely different purposes.

The new money, airgead, must fulfil the normal functions of money. It must be a reliable, trustworthy and stable store of value, medium for transactions, a unit of account, and means of deferred payment, and be distributed to all of the people or at least 75% of the people (not just the 1%), and it must also be debt free and interest free.

The supply of Airgead must be sufficient to ensure optimal production, consumption, investment and employment in the economy. A deficiency of money can create conditions of economic recession or depression and too much money can create inflation and stagflation. Also a low velocity of money caused by too much debt in the economy and too much government austerity or too much taxation can lead to very low or zero economic growth or recession. The latter explains the failure of Quantitative Easing in several countries after 2008.

The new money airgead would be created to pay for and build new infrastructure or repair or update it, and create new productive assets, and would thus be backed by hard assets. And 20% of this new currency would be backed by gold and silver.  New money creation will need to be strategically deployed by the government  into

• new infrastructure and upgrading of existing infrastructure (roads, bridges, ports, schools, hospitals, medical care and technologies, telecommunications, scientific-industrial research bodies, etc.)
• energy independence for the nation. Green energies and green technologies.
• non speculative high value and high potential assets, such as productive capital assets which will increase the productivity of businesses and the whole economy, increase the production of goods and services,  the export potential of the Irish economy, and increase new innovations for industry and agriculture
• ecological sustainability and organic farming. Increased food production. Food security for a nation and trading bloc.
• greater employee share ownership, cooperatives and the objectives of democratic capitalism
• relief efforts and compensation for national emergencies such as global pandemics, wars, ecological disasters, earthquakes, tsunamis, mass flooding

This would be debt free money and interest free money. These would be major investments in the Irish economy and would be a superior form of “supply side economics”, which would reap benefits immediately and over many decades and centuries.

• The Creation of a (a) Green Energy Investment Bank and  (b) Production and Productivity Bank and (c) Infrastructure Bank by the government which would channel newly created money into investment in productive assets and in infrastructure throughout the country. Most of these distributions of money would be debt free and interest free, while a small minority (10% or less) involving highly profitable or high payback ventures would involve non interest loans.
  Other intermediary organizations could be created by the government to circumvent and avoid the Lisbon treaty rule forcing governments to borrow from commercial banks.
• Successful Examples
  The airgead must be stable and trustworthy and be backed up by real tangible assets. For thousands of years gold and silver were used as money, and could be exchanged for money. The initial value of Airgead could be set at the same rate as the existing euro money. A few months later, the value of Airgead could be re-set at the price of so many units of gold and silver plus the value of tangible productive and infrastructure assets in the economy. A 80 to 20 ratio favouring tangible productive assets. The money supply would be increased to create non speculative assets such as production assets, infrastructure assets, and price-controlled housing assets. The benefit of this would be that money creation would be directly tied to asset creation. This money creation would come into being via investment in hard assets in the Irish economy and then spent after that by employees and business owners, and this would directly and indirectly stimulate the economy and / or maintain a strong and stable rate of economic growth over time. For example, if 20 billion airgead is pumped into new asset creation in a given year, the amount of new money created would be 20 billion airgead ; this would be debt free and interest free and would have a powerful stimulus effect.
  The best example of this are:
• the Guernsey pound lifted Guernsey out of economic depression and excessive debt in the early 1800’s and led to the building of public works and infrastructure to support industry and tourism there. This led to strong economic growth and prosperity for over a century. This continued into the 20th century and 21st century. It has proven to be very successful.
• the Greenback dollars printed by the Union government to pay for war supplies during the US civil war of the 1860’s which paid for and won that war
• During the American War of Independence (1776 -1784), the American soldiers and the war materials suppliers were paid in Continental notes, a type of scrip, created by the US Congress. For the Founding Fathers in America, the right to print and to use their own currency was a fundamental part of American Independence and of American commerce.
•  in the 18th century the government of the Pennsylvania Colony was successful in its efforts to create money to stimulate demand, and create strong economic growth, and managed to do so without prompting a high level of inflation
• the Bradbury pound in Britain during world war 1 which paid for Britain’s war supplies
• the New Deal in the USA in the 1930’s was funded by dollars created by the US government and invested in public works, infrastructure, housing, and businesses and helped end the Depression
• mefo bills in nazi Germany during the 1930’s which ended the depression in Germany and led to an economic boom
• the Worgl experiment in Austria during the 1930’s which ended the depression in that region of Austria
• the government’s money creating powers for public works was critical to the economic development of Canada from 1935-1971 and New Zealand from 1935-1939. Collins et al. (2013)
•  the MMT proposals by top economists in the USA in the 21st century to help rebuild the American economy and its infrastructure and heal its divided society.
  
• Inflation
  The international valuation of airgead would be based on 80% of the productive assets created in Ireland and 20% on the value of gold and silver. Its link to hard assets and to productive assets and production would make it anti inflationary. The examples from other countries above and International research has proven this for centuries.  Also linking 20% of the total money circulation to gold and silver prices would prevent the money from depreciating too rapidly during a boom and prevent inflation from getting out of control. Other measures such as:
  
• 100% reserve banking would greatly limit price speculation and over-consumption and accompanying inflationary pressures.
• The emphasis on investing the money in production of more goods and services, higher productivity and higher levels of innovation would have strong anti inflationary effects.
• Other measures such as re-introducing interest rates for a limited period and selling off government bonds would draw excess money out of a highly inflationary system, and cause a reduction in inflation.
• New restrictions on price speculation in assets, property and derivatives would be highly anti inflationary.
• And mass employee share ownership of industries would ensure wage restraint to prevent inflation.  

The Airgead currency value would fluctuate according to how well the Irish economy is doing in terms of its productive asset creation, the overall productivity of the nation, its exports and imports, unemployment figures, inflation or deflation, and the value of gold and silver.
The pareto principle of 80 to 20 has proved very successful in many fields. The 20% gold and silver aspect would act as an anchor on the airgead currency, giving it stability over time. This ratio could be adjusted in times of great economic uncertainty or distress.

• This new system would enable gradual expansion of the money supply over time, and this is far superior to the Gold standard or Silver standard which made the creation of new money dependent on new discoveries of gold and silver around the world. The gold standard and silver standard were proven to be deflationary over time and they greatly stifled or blocked economic growth. This has been the subject of much research in economics for over 100 years.
• The new money created could be used to fund tax reductions for workers and for businesses to lift economies out of recession / depression or low economic growth. This would not require extra government borrowing or cutbacks in public services and investment.
• The National Debt
  The national debt is fraudulent debt as it is money and interest created out of nothing by banks. Governments have been illegally deprived of their traditional legal and Constitutional right to create money. The new airgead money would be not be used to pay off all of the fraudulent national debt at once as the results would be highly inflationary. We could schedule a structured write off or write down of fraudulent national debt over 7 years, using the airgead money. And reduce taxes accordingly. This would have to be done via legal cases, as mentioned above.
• Bank Loans fully backed by actual money in the bank (100% reserve banking) and a bank fee included in total loan to ensure a stable money supply. Under the existing fraudulent and failed banking system, the interest is not created when the money is created, and thus must be extracted from the existing money supply, creating great economic instability.  Community banking  and public savings banking in Germany is the model for us.  See proposals by Dr. Richard Werner. This is being copied by Dr. Dolores Cahill and others in Ireland forming community banks here.
• The design of the Airgead should include the 7 leaders of the 1916 rising and be denominated in 1’s, 5’s, 10’s, 20’s, 50’s, 100’s, 500’s.  This would help a nationalistic consciousnesses. See image below.
  
  
  

• Legal Area
  The legal area is more difficult. All existing euro money (and pound money before that) is money created out of nothing by banks and lent out, it is thus fraudulent debt and this must be the subject of court cases taken by us to legally state this in courts, including in the high court case and supreme court. It has been and continues to be  a fraud committed against the people, and continues to be a crime. The new money, airgead, would be debt free and interest free, and represent new asset creation and hard work carried out by the people, thus it is backed up by hard assets and actual work, and this will give it legal status and social acceptability.
• Greater restrictions on speculation in the financial markets and the application of a Tobin tax internationally would rid countries of financial crashes and accompanying recessions or depressions, bail outs with austerity and the build up of massive national debt.
• Ethereum is most secure platform for the digital version of this airgead currency, as it has reliable authentication, the Bancor Protocol, uses blockchain technology, and the ability to expand over time. This digital currency would be backed by gold and silver and tangible productive assets as explained above. This would make it superior to Bitcoin and other crypto currencies which are based on speculation.

Academic publications and research covering this type of public money system strongly support such a system as it  would result in many economic as well as social benefits. The expected economic benefits include:  reduction in public and private debt levels, safer banking system, increased support to the real economy, greater economic stability, more effective monetary policy, better and more stable government finances, lower inflation and decreased systemic risk and risk of bank runs (Dyson et al., 2016; KPMG, 2016). Social and environmental benefits include: tackling unaffordable housing, slowing the rise in inequality, improving democracy and improving environmental and economic sustainability  (Dyson 2016)

Page 4 - Court Cases and Legal Cases being taken